Modeling a Classification Scheme of Epileptic Seizures Using Ontology Web Language
Bhaswati Ghosh, Partha Ghosh, I. Sikder
{"title":"Modeling a Classification Scheme of Epileptic Seizures Using Ontology Web Language","authors":"Bhaswati Ghosh, Partha Ghosh, I. Sikder","doi":"10.4018/jcmam.2010072004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ontology-based disease classification offers a way to rigorously assign disease types and to reuse diagnostic knowledge. However, ontology itself is not sufficient for fully representing the complex knowledge needed in classification schemes which are continuously evolving. This article describes the application of SWRL/ OWL-DL to the representation of knowledge intended for proper classification of a complex neurological condition, namely epilepsy. The authors present a rigorous and expandable approach to the ontological classification of epileptic seizures based on the 1981ILAE classification. It provides a classification knowledge base that can be extended with rules that describe constraints in SWRL. Moreover, by transforming an OWL classification scheme into JESS (rule engine in Java platform) facts and by transforming SWRL constraints into JESS, logical inferences and reasoning provide a mechanism to discover new knowledge and facts. The logic representation of epileptic classification amounts to greater community understanding among practitioners, knowledge reuse and interoperability. DOI: 10.4018/jcmam.2010072004 IGI PUBLISHING This paper appears in the publication, International Journal of Computational Models and Algorithms in Medicine, Volume 1, Issue 1 edited by Aryya Gangopadhyay © 2010, IGI Global 701 E. Chocolate Avenue, Hershey PA 17033-1240, USA Tel: 717/533-8845; Fax 717/533-8661; URL-http://www.igi-global.com ITJ 5529 46 International Journal of Computational Models and Algorithms in Medicine, 1(1), 45-60, January-March 2010 Copyright © 2010, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. ent definitions of phenotypes in the literature (Mahner & Kary, 1997). To enforce semantic specification, ontology has been widely used in many clinical diagnostic decision support systems (Yu, 2006). In particular, neurology, as a subspecialty, has many native built in semantics. Additionally, neurological conditions are unique and may not be very familiar to other medical specialists. The medications prescribed by neurologists and the investigations (e.g. Electroencephalogram (EEG), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Nerve Conduction Study/ Electromyography (NCS/ EMG) etc) are often different from other medical subspecialties. Hence, having a specialty specific ontology is essential to integrate neurology with other medical software systems. It is particularly important when developing a specific ontology system for epilepsy, a subspeciality within neurology. Epilepsy is a condition which is frequently encountered by general practitioners before these patients get referred to a neurologist. Epilepsy is a chronic neurological condition with significant morbidity and increased risk of mortality compared to the general population. Proper diagnosis and management is of essential importance not only in the short term but also for long term prognosis. In this article we present a rigorous and expandable approach to ontological classification of the epileptic seizures based on the 1981ILAE classification. Section 2 identifies the role of ontology for developing knowledge specification of domain concept, particularly in the context of clinical decision support systems, by a literature review. Section 3 outlines the complexities involved in classification of epilepsy type and syndrome. Section 4 describes the development of epilepsy ontology for knowledge modeling and reasoning. Finally, we evaluate the ontology in the context of clinical decision making. oNtoloGY for CraftiNG sPeCifiCatioNs of DoMaiN CoNCePts Historically, expert systems have been used to assist in medical decision making involving diagnosis, prediction, evaluation, monitoring (Heathfield, 1999; Hernandez, Sancho, Belmonte, Sierra, & Sanz, 1994; Keles & Keles, 2008; Liebowitz, 1997; Tsumoto, 2003). By encapsulating domain knowledge into a set of rules, expert systems simulate the performance of one or more human experts with expert knowledge and experience in a specific problem domain. With the advent of Semantic Web movement, a growing interest in ontologies is being noticed as means of representing human knowledge and as critical components in knowledge management over the Web. Various research communities commonly assume that ontologies are the appropriate modeling structure for representing knowledge. While expert systems emphasize technology, ontologies emphasize knowledge. Ontologies make a domain specific knowledge base reusable, sharable and interoperable. Domain-specific questions can then be answered by reasoning over such highly specialized knowledge. Ontologies have evolved in computer science as computational artifacts to provide computer systems with a conceptual yet computational model of a particular domain of interest. While expert systems provide excellent tools for reasoning with domain rules, they often lack the means to resolve semantic ambiguities inherent in the predicates and related facts. Hence, a key requirement is to reason in a semantically consistent way is to exploit both the ontology and the rule-based knowledge to draw inferences. 14 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the \"Add to Cart\" button on the publisher's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/modeling-classification-schemeepileptic-seizures/38944","PeriodicalId":162417,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Comput. Model. Algorithms Medicine","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Comput. Model. Algorithms Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jcmam.2010072004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Ontology-based disease classification offers a way to rigorously assign disease types and to reuse diagnostic knowledge. However, ontology itself is not sufficient for fully representing the complex knowledge needed in classification schemes which are continuously evolving. This article describes the application of SWRL/ OWL-DL to the representation of knowledge intended for proper classification of a complex neurological condition, namely epilepsy. The authors present a rigorous and expandable approach to the ontological classification of epileptic seizures based on the 1981ILAE classification. It provides a classification knowledge base that can be extended with rules that describe constraints in SWRL. Moreover, by transforming an OWL classification scheme into JESS (rule engine in Java platform) facts and by transforming SWRL constraints into JESS, logical inferences and reasoning provide a mechanism to discover new knowledge and facts. The logic representation of epileptic classification amounts to greater community understanding among practitioners, knowledge reuse and interoperability. DOI: 10.4018/jcmam.2010072004 IGI PUBLISHING This paper appears in the publication, International Journal of Computational Models and Algorithms in Medicine, Volume 1, Issue 1 edited by Aryya Gangopadhyay © 2010, IGI Global 701 E. Chocolate Avenue, Hershey PA 17033-1240, USA Tel: 717/533-8845; Fax 717/533-8661; URL-http://www.igi-global.com ITJ 5529 46 International Journal of Computational Models and Algorithms in Medicine, 1(1), 45-60, January-March 2010 Copyright © 2010, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. ent definitions of phenotypes in the literature (Mahner & Kary, 1997). To enforce semantic specification, ontology has been widely used in many clinical diagnostic decision support systems (Yu, 2006). In particular, neurology, as a subspecialty, has many native built in semantics. Additionally, neurological conditions are unique and may not be very familiar to other medical specialists. The medications prescribed by neurologists and the investigations (e.g. Electroencephalogram (EEG), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Nerve Conduction Study/ Electromyography (NCS/ EMG) etc) are often different from other medical subspecialties. Hence, having a specialty specific ontology is essential to integrate neurology with other medical software systems. It is particularly important when developing a specific ontology system for epilepsy, a subspeciality within neurology. Epilepsy is a condition which is frequently encountered by general practitioners before these patients get referred to a neurologist. Epilepsy is a chronic neurological condition with significant morbidity and increased risk of mortality compared to the general population. Proper diagnosis and management is of essential importance not only in the short term but also for long term prognosis. In this article we present a rigorous and expandable approach to ontological classification of the epileptic seizures based on the 1981ILAE classification. Section 2 identifies the role of ontology for developing knowledge specification of domain concept, particularly in the context of clinical decision support systems, by a literature review. Section 3 outlines the complexities involved in classification of epilepsy type and syndrome. Section 4 describes the development of epilepsy ontology for knowledge modeling and reasoning. Finally, we evaluate the ontology in the context of clinical decision making. oNtoloGY for CraftiNG sPeCifiCatioNs of DoMaiN CoNCePts Historically, expert systems have been used to assist in medical decision making involving diagnosis, prediction, evaluation, monitoring (Heathfield, 1999; Hernandez, Sancho, Belmonte, Sierra, & Sanz, 1994; Keles & Keles, 2008; Liebowitz, 1997; Tsumoto, 2003). By encapsulating domain knowledge into a set of rules, expert systems simulate the performance of one or more human experts with expert knowledge and experience in a specific problem domain. With the advent of Semantic Web movement, a growing interest in ontologies is being noticed as means of representing human knowledge and as critical components in knowledge management over the Web. Various research communities commonly assume that ontologies are the appropriate modeling structure for representing knowledge. While expert systems emphasize technology, ontologies emphasize knowledge. Ontologies make a domain specific knowledge base reusable, sharable and interoperable. Domain-specific questions can then be answered by reasoning over such highly specialized knowledge. Ontologies have evolved in computer science as computational artifacts to provide computer systems with a conceptual yet computational model of a particular domain of interest. While expert systems provide excellent tools for reasoning with domain rules, they often lack the means to resolve semantic ambiguities inherent in the predicates and related facts. Hence, a key requirement is to reason in a semantically consistent way is to exploit both the ontology and the rule-based knowledge to draw inferences. 14 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the publisher's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/modeling-classification-schemeepileptic-seizures/38944
基于本体Web语言的癫痫发作分类方案建模
基于本体论的疾病分类提供了一种严格分配疾病类型和重用诊断知识的方法。然而,本体本身并不足以完全表示不断发展的分类方案所需要的复杂知识。本文描述了SWRL/ OWL-DL在知识表示中的应用,用于对复杂的神经系统疾病(即癫痫)进行适当分类。作者提出了一种严格的和可扩展的方法,以1981ILAE分类为基础的癫痫发作的本体论分类。它提供了一个分类知识库,可以使用描述SWRL中的约束的规则对其进行扩展。此外,通过将OWL分类方案转换为JESS (Java平台中的规则引擎)事实和将SWRL约束转换为JESS,逻辑推理和推理提供了一种发现新知识和事实的机制。癫痫分类的逻辑表示相当于从业者之间更大的社区理解,知识重用和互操作性。DOI: 10.4018 / jcmam.2010072004这篇论文发表在国际医学计算模型和算法杂志上,第1卷,第1期,由Aryya Gangopadhyay编辑©2010,IGI Global 701 E. Chocolate Avenue, Hershey PA 17033-1240, USA Tel: 717/533-8845;传真717/533 - 8661;URL-http://www.igi-global.com ITJ 5529 46 International Journal of Computational Models and Algorithms in Medicine, 1(1), 45-60, January-March 2010版权所有©2010,IGI Global。未经IGI Global书面许可,禁止以印刷或电子形式复制或分发。文献中表型的定义(Mahner & Kary, 1997)。为了加强语义规范,本体被广泛应用于许多临床诊断决策支持系统中(Yu, 2006)。特别是神经学,作为一个亚专业,有许多固有的语义。此外,神经系统疾病是独特的,其他医学专家可能不太熟悉。神经科医生所开的药物和检查(如脑电图(EEG)、磁共振成像(MRI)、神经传导研究/肌电图(NCS/ EMG)等)往往与其他医学专科不同。因此,拥有一个专门的本体对于神经学与其他医疗软件系统的集成是必不可少的。在为癫痫(神经学中的一个亚专科)开发一个特定的本体系统时,这一点尤为重要。癫痫是全科医生在这些患者转介给神经科医生之前经常遇到的一种疾病。癫痫是一种慢性神经系统疾病,与一般人群相比,发病率高,死亡率高。正确的诊断和处理不仅对短期而且对长期预后都至关重要。在这篇文章中,我们提出了一种严格的和可扩展的方法,以1981ILAE分类为基础的癫痫发作的本体论分类。第2节通过文献综述,确定了本体在开发领域概念知识规范中的作用,特别是在临床决策支持系统的背景下。第3节概述了癫痫类型和综合征分类的复杂性。第4节描述了癫痫本体知识建模和推理的发展。最后,我们在临床决策的背景下评估本体论。历史上,专家系统已被用于辅助医疗决策,包括诊断、预测、评估和监测(Heathfield, 1999;Hernandez, Sancho, Belmonte, Sierra, & Sanz, 1994;Keles & Keles, 2008;Liebowitz, 1997;Tsumoto, 2003)。通过将领域知识封装到一组规则中,专家系统模拟一个或多个在特定问题领域具有专家知识和经验的人类专家的表现。随着语义网运动的出现,人们越来越关注本体作为表示人类知识的手段和Web上知识管理的关键组件。各种研究团体通常假设本体是表示知识的适当建模结构。专家系统强调技术,本体强调知识。本体使特定领域的知识库可重用、可共享和可互操作。然后,可以通过对这些高度专业化的知识进行推理来回答特定领域的问题。本体论在计算机科学中已经发展成为计算工件,为计算机系统提供特定感兴趣领域的概念但计算模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。