How to make research in school?-some examples off applying qualitative and mixed research strategies in analyzing of school environment on the basis of discussion about research strategies

Magda Karkowska
{"title":"How to make research in school?-some examples off applying qualitative and mixed research strategies in analyzing of school environment on the basis of discussion about research strategies","authors":"Magda Karkowska","doi":"10.2478/rp-2018-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Content presented in this article is focused on the reflection of the factors determining the choice of research strategy in the analysis of school environment. Some of the elements to be examined refer to the structural and functional model of a school, others to the interpretative model. As the assumptions about the nature of school reality are completely different within these models, depending on how the school is perceived, there are different ways of designing and conducting research. It is arguable whether derived from a structural and functional model of school (the school as an environment education, positivist paradigm) only quantitative analysis are justified, and after the adoption of the interactive model (the school as a system of socio-cultural, interpretative paradigm) only qualitative research should be conducted? The choice, at the first glance, quite obvious is a matter of more complex, because the strategy of research procedure also depends on some another factors: the order in which the study is carried out, the subject and the scope of the analysis, the experience of the researcher and to some extent, to the fact who are beneficients of the results. In the first part of this article author is trying to deal with these relationships, in the second part, there are presented a few examples of analysis when using qualitative methods or strategies. Most of them are realized within the model of so-called mixed research. They are only some examples presented and they should be understood as exemplifications, not in –depth exploration. Described problems might be explained and explored in the future using other methods and techniques, as well as combining them.","PeriodicalId":393809,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of Pedagogy","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rp-2018-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Content presented in this article is focused on the reflection of the factors determining the choice of research strategy in the analysis of school environment. Some of the elements to be examined refer to the structural and functional model of a school, others to the interpretative model. As the assumptions about the nature of school reality are completely different within these models, depending on how the school is perceived, there are different ways of designing and conducting research. It is arguable whether derived from a structural and functional model of school (the school as an environment education, positivist paradigm) only quantitative analysis are justified, and after the adoption of the interactive model (the school as a system of socio-cultural, interpretative paradigm) only qualitative research should be conducted? The choice, at the first glance, quite obvious is a matter of more complex, because the strategy of research procedure also depends on some another factors: the order in which the study is carried out, the subject and the scope of the analysis, the experience of the researcher and to some extent, to the fact who are beneficients of the results. In the first part of this article author is trying to deal with these relationships, in the second part, there are presented a few examples of analysis when using qualitative methods or strategies. Most of them are realized within the model of so-called mixed research. They are only some examples presented and they should be understood as exemplifications, not in –depth exploration. Described problems might be explained and explored in the future using other methods and techniques, as well as combining them.
如何在学校做研究?在探讨研究策略的基础上,列举了定性研究策略和混合研究策略在学校环境分析中的应用实例
本文的主要内容是对学校环境分析中决定研究策略选择的因素的反映。要检查的一些元素涉及学校的结构和功能模型,其他元素涉及解释模型。由于这些模型对学校现实本质的假设是完全不同的,根据对学校的看法,有不同的设计和开展研究的方法。是否从学校的结构和功能模型(学校作为环境教育,实证主义范式)中得出的只有定量分析是合理的,而在采用互动模型(学校作为社会文化系统,解释性范式)之后,只应该进行定性研究是有争议的?选择,乍一看,很明显,是一个更复杂的问题,因为研究程序的策略还取决于一些其他因素:研究进行的顺序,分析的主题和范围,研究人员的经验,在某种程度上,谁是结果的受益者。在本文的第一部分中,作者试图处理这些关系,在第二部分中,提出了一些使用定性方法或策略进行分析的例子。其中大多数是在所谓的混合研究模式下实现的。这些只是一些例子,它们应该被理解为例证,而不是深入的探索。所描述的问题可能会在将来使用其他方法和技术进行解释和探索,或者将它们结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信