Luxemburg’s Dilemmas: Lessons in Marxism as Political Praxis

Carter Vance
{"title":"Luxemburg’s Dilemmas: Lessons in Marxism as Political Praxis","authors":"Carter Vance","doi":"10.25071/2291-3637.40225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the tensions in the writings of Rosa Luxemburg as juxtaposed to her historical contemporaries in light of the debate on reformist Marxism. Primarily, her exchanges with Eduard Bernstein on the question of social revolution and with Vladimir Lenin on the question of nationality are explored. In relating these debates to present day examples of social and protest movements, as well as those for national independence, the article attempts to tease out guidance for Marxist political praxis in the current day. By close reading of the Bernstein-Luxemburg debate, it can be seen that the “reform or revolution” debate is often posited in terms which are inconsistent with those the authors originally meant. The article posits that there is no inherent tension or dichotomous relationship between reforms and revolutionary practice as consistent with the way the terms are normally used today. At the same time, it raises questions about what the practical limits of Marxism as both an analytic framework and a guide to political action are, particularly on the question of nationalism.","PeriodicalId":192252,"journal":{"name":"HPS: The Journal of History and Political Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HPS: The Journal of History and Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/2291-3637.40225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the tensions in the writings of Rosa Luxemburg as juxtaposed to her historical contemporaries in light of the debate on reformist Marxism. Primarily, her exchanges with Eduard Bernstein on the question of social revolution and with Vladimir Lenin on the question of nationality are explored. In relating these debates to present day examples of social and protest movements, as well as those for national independence, the article attempts to tease out guidance for Marxist political praxis in the current day. By close reading of the Bernstein-Luxemburg debate, it can be seen that the “reform or revolution” debate is often posited in terms which are inconsistent with those the authors originally meant. The article posits that there is no inherent tension or dichotomous relationship between reforms and revolutionary practice as consistent with the way the terms are normally used today. At the same time, it raises questions about what the practical limits of Marxism as both an analytic framework and a guide to political action are, particularly on the question of nationalism.
卢森堡的困境:马克思主义作为政治实践的教训
这篇文章调查了罗莎·卢森堡的著作中的紧张关系,并与她的历史同时代人在关于改良主义马克思主义的辩论中并列。主要探讨了她与爱德华·伯恩斯坦在社会革命问题上的交流以及与弗拉基米尔·列宁在民族问题上的交流。在将这些辩论与当今社会和抗议运动以及民族独立运动的例子联系起来时,本文试图梳理出当今马克思主义政治实践的指导。通过仔细阅读伯恩斯坦-卢森堡的辩论,我们可以看到,“改革还是革命”的辩论经常被设定在与作者最初意图不一致的术语中。文章认为,在改革和革命实践之间没有固有的紧张关系或二分关系,这与今天通常使用的术语方式是一致的。与此同时,它提出了马克思主义作为分析框架和政治行动指南的实践局限性的问题,特别是在民族主义问题上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信