Organizational Form and Expense-Preference Behavior: Evidence from Islamic Banks

M. Quttainah
{"title":"Organizational Form and Expense-Preference Behavior: Evidence from Islamic Banks","authors":"M. Quttainah","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2062951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the organizational forms of Islamic banks, corporate governance mechanism, and their effects on organizational behavior, specifically relating to managerial expense preferences. The paper opted for an OLS cluster regression and followed by a stochastic frontier approach test as a robustness test. Findings of this study indicate that organizational forms of Islamic banks influence managerial expense preferences. A stochastic frontier approach test supports the initial findings and reveals that the average noninterest cost inefficiency of Islamic banks without Shari’ah Boards is 23% compared to commercial banks. Islamic banks with Shari’ah Boards are, on average, 28% less noninterest cost inefficient compared to Islamic banks without Shari’ah Boards, and are on average, 16% less noninterest cost inefficient compared to commercial banks. Shari’ah Supervisory Boards’ positive implications for Islamic Banks are independent of the expectations of the governing structure or ownership. Specifically when looking at Islamic Banks with Shari’ah Supervisory Boards, managerial propensity to engage in self-serving behavior is reduced. This paper fulfils an identified need to understand how the distinct nature of Islamic banks organizational forms and governance impact managerial behavior.","PeriodicalId":130976,"journal":{"name":"ORG: Other Motivation","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORG: Other Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2062951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper examines the organizational forms of Islamic banks, corporate governance mechanism, and their effects on organizational behavior, specifically relating to managerial expense preferences. The paper opted for an OLS cluster regression and followed by a stochastic frontier approach test as a robustness test. Findings of this study indicate that organizational forms of Islamic banks influence managerial expense preferences. A stochastic frontier approach test supports the initial findings and reveals that the average noninterest cost inefficiency of Islamic banks without Shari’ah Boards is 23% compared to commercial banks. Islamic banks with Shari’ah Boards are, on average, 28% less noninterest cost inefficient compared to Islamic banks without Shari’ah Boards, and are on average, 16% less noninterest cost inefficient compared to commercial banks. Shari’ah Supervisory Boards’ positive implications for Islamic Banks are independent of the expectations of the governing structure or ownership. Specifically when looking at Islamic Banks with Shari’ah Supervisory Boards, managerial propensity to engage in self-serving behavior is reduced. This paper fulfils an identified need to understand how the distinct nature of Islamic banks organizational forms and governance impact managerial behavior.
组织形式与费用偏好行为:来自伊斯兰银行的证据
本文考察了伊斯兰银行的组织形式、公司治理机制及其对组织行为的影响,特别是与管理费用偏好有关的影响。本文选择OLS聚类回归,随后采用随机前沿方法检验作为稳健性检验。研究结果表明,伊斯兰银行的组织形式影响着管理者的费用偏好。一项随机前沿方法测试支持了最初的发现,并显示,与商业银行相比,没有伊斯兰教法委员会的伊斯兰银行的平均非利息成本低效率为23%。与没有伊斯兰教法委员会的伊斯兰银行相比,拥有伊斯兰教法委员会的伊斯兰银行的非利息成本效率平均低28%,与商业银行相比,非利息成本效率平均低16%。伊斯兰教法监事会对伊斯兰银行的积极影响独立于治理结构或所有权的期望。特别是当看到有伊斯兰教法监事会的伊斯兰银行时,管理层从事自私自利行为的倾向就会减少。本文满足了一个确定的需要,即了解伊斯兰银行组织形式和治理的独特性质如何影响管理行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信