ADEQUATE OR NOT? JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORMS IN CHINA

Jiang Na, Han Rong
{"title":"ADEQUATE OR NOT? JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORMS IN CHINA","authors":"Jiang Na, Han Rong","doi":"10.53555/eijhss.v4i1.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From 2014 to 2015, the shortcomings of the Chinese justice system were once again made clear with the identification of thirteen serious wrongful convictions.[1] In some cases in question, innocent people were executed. The Ministry of Public \nSecurity (MPS), the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) and Procuratorate (SPP) have responded to these cases by introducing specific measures to deepen reforms to the justice system, including and not limited to life-long responsibility. [2] Does introduction of this new system as a part of official responses adequately ensure that justice can be done by mending the fundamental flaws that led to wrongful convictions? In order to answer this question, it is necessary to examine what occurred in each of typical cases. \n  \n","PeriodicalId":109852,"journal":{"name":"EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science","volume":"282 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53555/eijhss.v4i1.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From 2014 to 2015, the shortcomings of the Chinese justice system were once again made clear with the identification of thirteen serious wrongful convictions.[1] In some cases in question, innocent people were executed. The Ministry of Public Security (MPS), the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) and Procuratorate (SPP) have responded to these cases by introducing specific measures to deepen reforms to the justice system, including and not limited to life-long responsibility. [2] Does introduction of this new system as a part of official responses adequately ensure that justice can be done by mending the fundamental flaws that led to wrongful convictions? In order to answer this question, it is necessary to examine what occurred in each of typical cases.  
够不够?中国的司法问责与刑事司法改革
从2014年到2015年,中国司法制度的缺陷再次暴露出来,共发现13起严重的错判。[1]在某些案件中,无辜的人被处决。公安部(MPS)、最高人民法院(SPC)和检察院(SPP)对这些案件做出了回应,推出了深化司法体制改革的具体措施,包括但不限于终身责任。[2]作为官方回应的一部分,这种新制度的引入是否足以确保通过弥补导致错误定罪的根本缺陷来伸张正义?为了回答这个问题,有必要研究一下在每个典型案例中发生了什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信