Characteristic of Fuzzy, ANN, and ANFIS for Brushless DC Motor Controller: An Evaluation by Dynamic Test

A. Setiawan, Bayu Rudiyanto, Satryo B Utomo, M. Setiyo
{"title":"Characteristic of Fuzzy, ANN, and ANFIS for Brushless DC Motor Controller: An Evaluation by Dynamic Test","authors":"A. Setiawan, Bayu Rudiyanto, Satryo B Utomo, M. Setiyo","doi":"10.30880/ijie.2021.13.06.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brushless DC (BLDC) motors are the most popular motors used by the industry because they are easy to control. BLDC motors are generally controlled by artificial controls such as Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS). However, the performance of the BLDC control system in previous studies was compared separately with their respective parameters, making it difficult to evaluate comprehensively. Therefore, in order to investigate the characteristic performance of Fuzzy, ANN, and ANFIS, this article provides a comparison of these artificial controls. Two scenarios of the dynamic tests are conducted to investigate control performance under constant torque-various speed and constant speed-various torque. By dynamic testing, characteristics of Fuzzy, ANN, and ANFIS can be observed as real applications. The testing parameters are: Settling Time, Overshoot and Overdamp (in the graph and average value), and then statistic performance are: Integral Square Error (ISE), Integral Absolute Error (IAE), Integral Time Absolute Error (ITAE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The test result in scenario 1 showed that the ANN has a better performance compared to other controllers with the MAE, IAE, ITAE, and ISE value of 31.3003; 105.6280; 208.0630; and 5,7289 e4, respectively. However, in scenario 2, ANN only has a better performance compared to other controllers on just a few parameters. In scenario 2, ANN is indeed able to maintain speed but it has a more ripple value than ANFIS. Even so, the ripple that occurs in ANN does not have too much value compared to the setpoint. Therefore, the MAE value of the ANN is smaller than the ANFIS (18.8937 of ANN and 28.4685 of ANFIS).","PeriodicalId":122564,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Integrated Engineering","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Integrated Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2021.13.06.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Brushless DC (BLDC) motors are the most popular motors used by the industry because they are easy to control. BLDC motors are generally controlled by artificial controls such as Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS). However, the performance of the BLDC control system in previous studies was compared separately with their respective parameters, making it difficult to evaluate comprehensively. Therefore, in order to investigate the characteristic performance of Fuzzy, ANN, and ANFIS, this article provides a comparison of these artificial controls. Two scenarios of the dynamic tests are conducted to investigate control performance under constant torque-various speed and constant speed-various torque. By dynamic testing, characteristics of Fuzzy, ANN, and ANFIS can be observed as real applications. The testing parameters are: Settling Time, Overshoot and Overdamp (in the graph and average value), and then statistic performance are: Integral Square Error (ISE), Integral Absolute Error (IAE), Integral Time Absolute Error (ITAE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The test result in scenario 1 showed that the ANN has a better performance compared to other controllers with the MAE, IAE, ITAE, and ISE value of 31.3003; 105.6280; 208.0630; and 5,7289 e4, respectively. However, in scenario 2, ANN only has a better performance compared to other controllers on just a few parameters. In scenario 2, ANN is indeed able to maintain speed but it has a more ripple value than ANFIS. Even so, the ripple that occurs in ANN does not have too much value compared to the setpoint. Therefore, the MAE value of the ANN is smaller than the ANFIS (18.8937 of ANN and 28.4685 of ANFIS).
无刷直流电动机控制器的模糊、人工神经网络和反神经网络特性:动态试验评价
无刷直流(BLDC)电机是最流行的电机使用的工业,因为它们易于控制。无刷直流电动机一般由模糊逻辑控制器(FLC)、人工神经网络(ANN)和自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)等人工控制器控制。然而,以往的研究都是将无刷直流控制系统的性能分别与各自的参数进行比较,难以综合评价。因此,为了研究模糊、人工神经网络和反神经网络的特征性能,本文对这些人工控制进行了比较。在恒转矩-变转速和恒转速-变转矩两种工况下进行了动态试验。通过动态测试,可以观察到模糊神经网络、人工神经网络和人工神经网络在实际应用中的特点。测试参数为:沉降时间、超调量、过阻尼(图中及平均值),统计性能为:积分平方误差(ISE)、积分绝对误差(IAE)、积分时间绝对误差(ITAE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)。场景1的测试结果表明,ANN的MAE、IAE、ITAE、ISE值为31.3003,性能优于其他控制器;105.6280;208.0630;和5,7289 e4。然而,在场景2中,与其他控制器相比,人工神经网络仅在几个参数上具有更好的性能。在场景2中,ANN确实能够保持速度,但它比ANFIS具有更大的纹波值。即便如此,与设定值相比,在人工神经网络中发生的纹波并没有太大的价值。因此,ANN的MAE值小于ANFIS (ANN的MAE值为18.8937,ANFIS的MAE值为28.4685)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信