Students’ Perceptions on Using Rubrics as a Peer and Self-Assessment Tool in EFL Speaking Courses

Thi Nguyet Dang, Thi Huong Le
{"title":"Students’ Perceptions on Using Rubrics as a Peer and Self-Assessment Tool in EFL Speaking Courses","authors":"Thi Nguyet Dang, Thi Huong Le","doi":"10.54855/ijte.23337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis study explores how rubrics can be used as a tool for students to self-assess and peer-assess their speaking performance in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classes by examining the perceptions of freshmen English language teaching majors (N=96). Data was collected using a survey questionnaire consisting of 38 questions organized into six clusters, covering the quality of rubrics, their usefulness in assignment preparation, peer and self-assessment, language learning, quality of feedback, and challenges in utilizing them. After completing a listening and speaking module that included practice in using rubrics for peer and self-evaluation of speaking performances, students were asked to rate their perceptions on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from \"totally disagree\" to \"totally agree\". Consistent with previous research in the same area, the findings suggest that students perceive rubrics to be of high quality and useful. However, the study also highlights the challenges that students face while using rubrics for peer and self-assessment, which is in contrast to the conclusions drawn by some other researchers.\n","PeriodicalId":196814,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of TESOL & Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of TESOL & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.23337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores how rubrics can be used as a tool for students to self-assess and peer-assess their speaking performance in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classes by examining the perceptions of freshmen English language teaching majors (N=96). Data was collected using a survey questionnaire consisting of 38 questions organized into six clusters, covering the quality of rubrics, their usefulness in assignment preparation, peer and self-assessment, language learning, quality of feedback, and challenges in utilizing them. After completing a listening and speaking module that included practice in using rubrics for peer and self-evaluation of speaking performances, students were asked to rate their perceptions on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from "totally disagree" to "totally agree". Consistent with previous research in the same area, the findings suggest that students perceive rubrics to be of high quality and useful. However, the study also highlights the challenges that students face while using rubrics for peer and self-assessment, which is in contrast to the conclusions drawn by some other researchers.
学生对英语口语课程中使用标准作为同伴和自我评价工具的看法
本研究通过调查英语教学专业大一新生(N=96)的看法,探讨了如何将规则作为一种工具,让学生在英语作为外语(EFL)课程中自我评估和同行评估自己的口语表现。数据是通过一份调查问卷收集的,该问卷由38个问题组成,分为六组,涵盖了标准的质量、它们在作业准备中的有用性、同伴和自我评估、语言学习、反馈的质量以及使用它们的挑战。在完成听力和口语模块(包括练习使用同伴和自我评价口语表现的规则)后,学生们被要求用李克特五分制对自己的看法进行评分,范围从“完全不同意”到“完全同意”。与先前在同一领域的研究一致,研究结果表明,学生认为规则是高质量和有用的。然而,该研究也强调了学生在使用同伴和自我评估的规则时面临的挑战,这与其他一些研究人员得出的结论形成了对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信