Life Lessons in Polish Schools: Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Girls and Boys

Aleksandra Gajda
{"title":"Life Lessons in Polish Schools: Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Girls and Boys","authors":"Aleksandra Gajda","doi":"10.18778/2450-4491.14.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to analyse teachers’ interactions with students in order to track the differences in the messages given to pupils depending on their gender, and to study the opinions of students about the behaviour of their teachers. As part of the research, 34 hours of lessons (divided into 17 hours of mathematics and 17 hours of Polish language lessons) were observed. Additionally, the opinions of 68 students (34 girls and 34 boys) were analysed. The study employs mixed methods of data analysis (Stromquist 2007), combining a qualitative approach based on elements of grounded theory (Glaser, Strauss 2017) with quantitative comparisons of the frequency of the teacher’s behavior, using χ2 tests. The results indicate the differing nature of teachers’ interactions with girls and boys; the number of interactions and their quality are more favourable in the case of boys. Girls are more often overlooked, and their achievements and contributions are less frequently noticed. In addition, students are aware of the differences in how they are treated by their teachers, pointing out, inter alia, to the importance of providing equal treatment to all students.","PeriodicalId":275545,"journal":{"name":"Nauki o Wychowaniu. Studia Interdyscyplinarne","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauki o Wychowaniu. Studia Interdyscyplinarne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2450-4491.14.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyse teachers’ interactions with students in order to track the differences in the messages given to pupils depending on their gender, and to study the opinions of students about the behaviour of their teachers. As part of the research, 34 hours of lessons (divided into 17 hours of mathematics and 17 hours of Polish language lessons) were observed. Additionally, the opinions of 68 students (34 girls and 34 boys) were analysed. The study employs mixed methods of data analysis (Stromquist 2007), combining a qualitative approach based on elements of grounded theory (Glaser, Strauss 2017) with quantitative comparisons of the frequency of the teacher’s behavior, using χ2 tests. The results indicate the differing nature of teachers’ interactions with girls and boys; the number of interactions and their quality are more favourable in the case of boys. Girls are more often overlooked, and their achievements and contributions are less frequently noticed. In addition, students are aware of the differences in how they are treated by their teachers, pointing out, inter alia, to the importance of providing equal treatment to all students.
波兰学校的人生课程:教师对女孩和男孩的态度
这项研究的目的是分析教师与学生的互动,以追踪不同性别的学生所得到的信息的差异,并研究学生对教师行为的看法。作为研究的一部分,研究人员观察了34小时的课程(分为17小时的数学课程和17小时的波兰语课程)。此外,还分析了68名学生(34名女生和34名男生)的意见。该研究采用混合数据分析方法(Stromquist 2007),结合基于扎根理论要素的定性方法(Glaser, Strauss 2017)和使用χ2检验的教师行为频率的定量比较。结果表明,教师与女孩和男孩的互动性质不同;在男孩的情况下,互动的数量和质量更有利。女孩往往被忽视,她们的成就和贡献很少被注意到。此外,学生们意识到老师对待他们的方式存在差异,并指出,除其他外,为所有学生提供平等待遇的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信