Housing Tenure and Unemployment

Richard K. Green, B. Wang
{"title":"Housing Tenure and Unemployment","authors":"Richard K. Green, B. Wang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2628242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we test whether tenure choice influences employment. This influencemight arise through a number of channels, including transaction costs, lock-in effects, wealtheffects, externalities and commuting times. These factors could collectively have either a positiveor negative effect on employment outcomes. Using Current Population Survey panel data from1988 to 2013, we conclude that tenure rates do not statistically influence employment growthrates. Using Panel Study of Income Dynamics data from 1994 to 2011 and Survey of Income andProgram Participation data from 1995 to 2013, we conclude that home-owning does not increasepeoples’ unemployment probabilities or significantly increase people’s unemployment spells ordecrease people’s wages. But home-owning does affect employment by lengthening employmentdurations and increasing the likelihood of interstate moves. By investigating some features ofhome-owing- presence of mortgages, negative equity, wealth accumulation and attachment tocommunities-we conclude that having mortgages, negative equity and wealth accumulationmight affect job outcomes, largely in a positive direction.","PeriodicalId":285024,"journal":{"name":"Unemployment Insurance eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unemployment Insurance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2628242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this article, we test whether tenure choice influences employment. This influencemight arise through a number of channels, including transaction costs, lock-in effects, wealtheffects, externalities and commuting times. These factors could collectively have either a positiveor negative effect on employment outcomes. Using Current Population Survey panel data from1988 to 2013, we conclude that tenure rates do not statistically influence employment growthrates. Using Panel Study of Income Dynamics data from 1994 to 2011 and Survey of Income andProgram Participation data from 1995 to 2013, we conclude that home-owning does not increasepeoples’ unemployment probabilities or significantly increase people’s unemployment spells ordecrease people’s wages. But home-owning does affect employment by lengthening employmentdurations and increasing the likelihood of interstate moves. By investigating some features ofhome-owing- presence of mortgages, negative equity, wealth accumulation and attachment tocommunities-we conclude that having mortgages, negative equity and wealth accumulationmight affect job outcomes, largely in a positive direction.
租住房屋与失业
在本文中,我们检验了任期选择是否影响就业。这种影响可能通过多种渠道产生,包括交易成本、锁定效应、财富效应、外部性和通勤时间。这些因素可能对就业结果产生积极或消极的影响。利用1988年至2013年的当前人口调查面板数据,我们得出结论,任期率在统计上不影响就业增长。利用1994年至2011年的收入动态面板研究数据和1995年至2013年的收入和计划参与调查数据,我们得出结论,拥有住房不会增加人们的失业概率,也不会显着增加人们的失业时间或降低人们的工资。但拥有住房确实会影响就业,因为它延长了就业期限,增加了州际迁移的可能性。通过调查房屋贷款的一些特征——抵押贷款、负资产、财富积累和对社区的依恋——我们得出结论,拥有抵押贷款、负资产和财富积累可能会影响工作结果,而且在很大程度上是积极的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信