Quality and Auditing in TESOL: A Comparative Case Study

Parveen Kaur
{"title":"Quality and Auditing in TESOL: A Comparative Case Study","authors":"Parveen Kaur","doi":"10.54692/jelle.2021.0304103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The researcher was influenced by best English language teaching standards in England to find TESOL best practices. The study was carried out in three reputable elementary schools where English as a second language was taught. The research was conducted at three prominent primary schools in Birmingham, England, where the majority of the kids were from ethnic minorities. The fieldwork resulted in the refining and validation of an audit that was initially based on literature. Following that, fieldwork was conducted in a developing nation using the same methodology as in the United Kingdom. This step entails conducting a TESOL audit in order to determine the strengths and limitations of TESOL services in Malaysian and international TESOL institutions. This article describes the technique and methods used to build and validate the audit tool, which is particularly useful for codifying and identifying TESOL best practices. The method begins with a brief description of quality and the two types of quality measurements that are employed, benchmarking and auditing. The grounded, iterative approach to the creation and implementation of research instruments was then discussed.","PeriodicalId":127188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Language, Literature and Education","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Language, Literature and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54692/jelle.2021.0304103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The researcher was influenced by best English language teaching standards in England to find TESOL best practices. The study was carried out in three reputable elementary schools where English as a second language was taught. The research was conducted at three prominent primary schools in Birmingham, England, where the majority of the kids were from ethnic minorities. The fieldwork resulted in the refining and validation of an audit that was initially based on literature. Following that, fieldwork was conducted in a developing nation using the same methodology as in the United Kingdom. This step entails conducting a TESOL audit in order to determine the strengths and limitations of TESOL services in Malaysian and international TESOL institutions. This article describes the technique and methods used to build and validate the audit tool, which is particularly useful for codifying and identifying TESOL best practices. The method begins with a brief description of quality and the two types of quality measurements that are employed, benchmarking and auditing. The grounded, iterative approach to the creation and implementation of research instruments was then discussed.
英语教学质量与审计:比较案例研究
研究者受到英国最佳英语教学标准的影响,寻找TESOL最佳实践。这项研究是在三所著名的以英语为第二语言的小学进行的。这项研究是在英国伯明翰的三所著名小学进行的,这些学校的大多数孩子都来自少数民族。实地工作的结果是对最初基于文献的审计进行了细化和验证。随后,在一个发展中国家使用与联合王国相同的方法进行了实地调查。这一步骤需要进行TESOL审计,以确定马来西亚和国际TESOL机构的TESOL服务的优势和局限性。本文描述了用于构建和验证审计工具的技术和方法,该工具对于编写和识别TESOL最佳实践特别有用。该方法以质量的简要描述和所采用的两种类型的质量度量开始,即基准测试和审计。然后讨论了建立和实施研究工具的基础和迭代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信