Chronic thresholds for evoking perceptual responses in the rat sensory cortex

E. Brunton, E. Yan, Katherine L. Gillespie-Jones, Arthur James Lowery, R. Rajan
{"title":"Chronic thresholds for evoking perceptual responses in the rat sensory cortex","authors":"E. Brunton, E. Yan, Katherine L. Gillespie-Jones, Arthur James Lowery, R. Rajan","doi":"10.1109/NER.2015.7146669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stimulation of neural tissue for the remediation of brain and sensory deficits requires that stimulation paradigms are selected carefully to deliver the most stable, efficient and safest stimulation to evoke the desired therapeutic response. Here we asked two questions of a penetrating cortical prosthesis use to evoke sensory-guided behavior: 1) does the threshold charge required to evoke a behavioral response change over time? 2) what effect does changing the frequency of stimulation have on stimulus threshold? To answer these questions we implanted a 4-electrode array into the somatosensory (tactile) cortex of a Sprague Dawley rat. The threshold charge to evoke a behavioral response was measured weekly over a 9-week period. Stimulation frequencies of 50 or 200 Hz were used, while all other stimulus parameters were kept constant. Within a maximum current limit of 100 μA and with a pulse width of 200 μs, we reliably elicited a behavioral response on 2 electrodes. Over the 9 week implantation period there was an initial increase in threshold current at 4 weeks, followed by a decrease at week 5 post-implantation; by week 8 post-implantation, thresholds appeared to have stabilized. Although we could reliably evoke a response at both 50 and 200 Hz, the stimulus frequency of 50 Hz required on average a lower threshold charge to evoke a response.","PeriodicalId":137451,"journal":{"name":"2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2015.7146669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Stimulation of neural tissue for the remediation of brain and sensory deficits requires that stimulation paradigms are selected carefully to deliver the most stable, efficient and safest stimulation to evoke the desired therapeutic response. Here we asked two questions of a penetrating cortical prosthesis use to evoke sensory-guided behavior: 1) does the threshold charge required to evoke a behavioral response change over time? 2) what effect does changing the frequency of stimulation have on stimulus threshold? To answer these questions we implanted a 4-electrode array into the somatosensory (tactile) cortex of a Sprague Dawley rat. The threshold charge to evoke a behavioral response was measured weekly over a 9-week period. Stimulation frequencies of 50 or 200 Hz were used, while all other stimulus parameters were kept constant. Within a maximum current limit of 100 μA and with a pulse width of 200 μs, we reliably elicited a behavioral response on 2 electrodes. Over the 9 week implantation period there was an initial increase in threshold current at 4 weeks, followed by a decrease at week 5 post-implantation; by week 8 post-implantation, thresholds appeared to have stabilized. Although we could reliably evoke a response at both 50 and 200 Hz, the stimulus frequency of 50 Hz required on average a lower threshold charge to evoke a response.
唤起大鼠感觉皮层知觉反应的慢性阈值
为了修复大脑和感觉缺陷,神经组织的刺激需要仔细选择刺激模式,以提供最稳定、最有效和最安全的刺激,以引起所需的治疗反应。在这里,我们提出了两个关于穿透性皮质假体用于唤起感觉引导行为的问题:1)唤起行为反应所需的阈值电荷是否随时间而改变?2)改变刺激频率对刺激阈值有何影响?为了回答这些问题,我们将一个4电极阵列植入一只斯普拉格·道利大鼠的体感(触觉)皮层。唤起行为反应的阈值收费在9周内每周测量一次。刺激频率为50或200 Hz,其他刺激参数保持不变。在最大电流限制为100 μA,脉冲宽度为200 μs的情况下,我们在两个电极上可靠地引发了行为响应。在9周的植入期中,第4周阈值电流开始升高,随后在植入后第5周降低;到植入后第8周,阈值似乎已经稳定。虽然我们可以可靠地在50和200赫兹时唤起反应,但50赫兹的刺激频率平均需要较低的阈值电荷来唤起反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信