Differentiation between stage I ovarian cancer and borderline epithelial ovarian tumor by apparent diffusion coefficient value

H. Masamoto, K. Mekaru, T. Nakasone, Tadatsugu Kinjo, T. Nakamoto, W. Kudaka, Y. Aoki, Y. Kinjyo, Yuko Iraha, Y. Taira
{"title":"Differentiation between stage I ovarian cancer and borderline epithelial ovarian tumor by apparent diffusion coefficient value","authors":"H. Masamoto, K. Mekaru, T. Nakasone, Tadatsugu Kinjo, T. Nakamoto, W. Kudaka, Y. Aoki, Y. Kinjyo, Yuko Iraha, Y. Taira","doi":"10.31487/j.RDI.2018.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To clarify usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in the differential diagnosis of stage I \nmalignant epithelial ovarian tumor (MOT) and borderline epithelial ovarian tumor (BOT), the ADC value \nof the solid portion or thickened wall of ovarian tumors was evaluated by a 1.5-T magnetic resonance \nimaging system in 18 cases of BOT and MOT. The median of average ADC value was 1.668 × 10?3 mm2 \n/s \nfor BOT and 1.021 × 10?3 mm2 \n/s for MOT (p = 0.0005), and the median of minimum ADC value was 1.394 \n× 10?3 mm2 \n/s for BOT and 0.812× 10?3 mm2 \n/s for MOT (p = 0.0006), both of which were significantly \nlower in MOT than that in BOT. So the ADC value is useful and especially the minimum ADC value is \nuseful in that it can easily measure the ROI so that it contains solid portion or thickened wall.","PeriodicalId":112166,"journal":{"name":"Is it all just an Akt - you’d be SMAD to believe it! Role of TGFβ1 in oral cancer metastasis","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Is it all just an Akt - you’d be SMAD to believe it! Role of TGFβ1 in oral cancer metastasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.RDI.2018.02.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To clarify usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in the differential diagnosis of stage I malignant epithelial ovarian tumor (MOT) and borderline epithelial ovarian tumor (BOT), the ADC value of the solid portion or thickened wall of ovarian tumors was evaluated by a 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging system in 18 cases of BOT and MOT. The median of average ADC value was 1.668 × 10?3 mm2 /s for BOT and 1.021 × 10?3 mm2 /s for MOT (p = 0.0005), and the median of minimum ADC value was 1.394 × 10?3 mm2 /s for BOT and 0.812× 10?3 mm2 /s for MOT (p = 0.0006), both of which were significantly lower in MOT than that in BOT. So the ADC value is useful and especially the minimum ADC value is useful in that it can easily measure the ROI so that it contains solid portion or thickened wall.
表观扩散系数值对ⅰ期卵巢癌与交界性上皮性卵巢癌的鉴别价值
为了明确表观弥散系数(ADC)值在卵巢恶性上皮性肿瘤(MOT)和交界性上皮性肿瘤(BOT)鉴别诊断中的价值,采用1.5 t磁共振成像系统对18例BOT和MOT卵巢肿瘤实性部分或增厚壁的ADC值进行评价。平均ADC值的中位数为1.668 × 10?3 mm2 /s的BOT和1.021 × 10?3 mm2 /s (p = 0.0005),最小ADC值中位数为1.394 × 10?BOT为3 mm2 /s, 0.812× 10?MOT组为3 mm2 /s (p = 0.0006), MOT组均显著低于BOT组。因此ADC值是有用的,尤其是最小ADC值,因为它可以很容易地测量ROI,使其包含固体部分或增厚壁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信