The Challenges of Upward Regulatory Harmonization: The Case of Sustainability Reporting in the European Union

Daniel Kinderman
{"title":"The Challenges of Upward Regulatory Harmonization: The Case of Sustainability Reporting in the European Union","authors":"Daniel Kinderman","doi":"10.1111/REGO.12240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What are the prospects for the upward harmonization of regulatory standards, and why do governments support or oppose more stringent supranational regulation? To answer these questions, this paper examines an important case of upward regulatory harmonization, the European Union’s non-financial disclosure Directive 2014/95/EU, which requires large firms to report on their social, environmental, and human rights impacts. In spite of favorable circumstances, the Directive’s opponents watered down the Commission’s proposal during the course of the negotiations. Upward regulatory harmonization is difficult because of the adjustment costs it imposes on the private sector. The paper provides an in-depth analysis of countries’ positions in the negotiations: Germany was the most hardline opponent, France the strongest supporter, and the United Kingdom was somewhere in between. For most countries, private sector adjustment costs determine government support and opposition for upward harmonization at the supranational level, but the analysis shows that partisan politics and varieties of capitalism also matter. For a closely related paper, please see \"The tenuous link between CSR performance and support for regulation: Business associations and Nordic regulatory preferences regarding the corporate transparency law 2014/95/EU\" https://ssrn.com/abstract=3451630.","PeriodicalId":434487,"journal":{"name":"European Economics: Microeconomics & Industrial Organization eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economics: Microeconomics & Industrial Organization eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/REGO.12240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

What are the prospects for the upward harmonization of regulatory standards, and why do governments support or oppose more stringent supranational regulation? To answer these questions, this paper examines an important case of upward regulatory harmonization, the European Union’s non-financial disclosure Directive 2014/95/EU, which requires large firms to report on their social, environmental, and human rights impacts. In spite of favorable circumstances, the Directive’s opponents watered down the Commission’s proposal during the course of the negotiations. Upward regulatory harmonization is difficult because of the adjustment costs it imposes on the private sector. The paper provides an in-depth analysis of countries’ positions in the negotiations: Germany was the most hardline opponent, France the strongest supporter, and the United Kingdom was somewhere in between. For most countries, private sector adjustment costs determine government support and opposition for upward harmonization at the supranational level, but the analysis shows that partisan politics and varieties of capitalism also matter. For a closely related paper, please see "The tenuous link between CSR performance and support for regulation: Business associations and Nordic regulatory preferences regarding the corporate transparency law 2014/95/EU" https://ssrn.com/abstract=3451630.
向上监管协调的挑战:以欧盟可持续发展报告为例
监管标准向上协调的前景如何?为什么政府支持或反对更严格的超国家监管?为了回答这些问题,本文研究了向上监管协调的一个重要案例,即欧盟的非财务披露指令2014/95/EU,该指令要求大公司报告其社会、环境和人权影响。尽管环境有利,但该指令的反对者在谈判过程中淡化了委员会的提议。向上的监管协调是困难的,因为它给私营部门带来了调整成本。本文对各国在谈判中的立场进行了深入分析:德国是最强硬的反对者,法国是最坚定的支持者,而英国介于两者之间。对大多数国家来说,私营部门的调整成本决定了政府对超国家层面向上协调的支持和反对,但分析表明,党派政治和资本主义的多样性也很重要。有关密切相关的论文,请参阅“企业社会责任绩效与监管支持之间的微弱联系:商业协会和北欧关于公司透明度法2014/95/EU的监管偏好”https://ssrn.com/abstract=3451630。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信