Evaluation of Expectations and Quality Health Care Based on Patients’ Perspectives in Universitas Gadjah Mada Academic Hospital

Sugiarsih Sugiarsih
{"title":"Evaluation of Expectations and Quality Health Care Based on Patients’ Perspectives in Universitas Gadjah Mada Academic Hospital","authors":"Sugiarsih Sugiarsih","doi":"10.1234/AHJ.V1I1.33608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Health services provided by hospitals can be used as capital to improve the image of services and compete with other hospitals in order to be the patients’ preferred choice in solving their health problems. Patients have different perceptions of medical services provided which can be used for describing the quality of hospital services.Methods: This research was a descriptive analytic study with a cross-sectional design, where data retrieval used a questionnaire which measures the patients’ expectations and perceptions of services from the Outpatient, Inpatient and Emergency Departments with 5 dimensions of quality: tangibles, responsiveness, empathy, reliability and assurance. The study population was patients who visited the outpatient, inpatient and emergency departments totaling 5000 samples as calculated by the Slovin formula, with a sample set of 120 respondents selected by random sampling. Data were analyzed using independent sample t tests to determine differences in patients’ expectations and perceptions of services obtained at the time of visit. ANOVA tests were used to analyze data about differences in patients’ expectations and perceptions of the outpatient, inpatient and ER departments. For the descriptive study, the data were analyzed by finding the average of the patients’ responses. Results: Patient expectations of service quality was an important quality dimension which reached an average value of 93.97. The perception of the quality of services reached a value of 84.12. Statistically, there was no difference between the quality of the outpatient, emergency and inpatient departments with p=0.4 (>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in patient expectations and perceptions of service quality delivered both with p=0.000 (<0.05). Conclusions: According to the perceptions of patients, quality of service at the Universitas Gadjah Mada Hospital is excellent. There was no difference between the quality of service in the outpatient, emergency and inpatient units. There were statistically significant differences between patient expectations and perceptions of service quality.","PeriodicalId":271282,"journal":{"name":"Academic Hospital Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Hospital Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1234/AHJ.V1I1.33608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health services provided by hospitals can be used as capital to improve the image of services and compete with other hospitals in order to be the patients’ preferred choice in solving their health problems. Patients have different perceptions of medical services provided which can be used for describing the quality of hospital services.Methods: This research was a descriptive analytic study with a cross-sectional design, where data retrieval used a questionnaire which measures the patients’ expectations and perceptions of services from the Outpatient, Inpatient and Emergency Departments with 5 dimensions of quality: tangibles, responsiveness, empathy, reliability and assurance. The study population was patients who visited the outpatient, inpatient and emergency departments totaling 5000 samples as calculated by the Slovin formula, with a sample set of 120 respondents selected by random sampling. Data were analyzed using independent sample t tests to determine differences in patients’ expectations and perceptions of services obtained at the time of visit. ANOVA tests were used to analyze data about differences in patients’ expectations and perceptions of the outpatient, inpatient and ER departments. For the descriptive study, the data were analyzed by finding the average of the patients’ responses. Results: Patient expectations of service quality was an important quality dimension which reached an average value of 93.97. The perception of the quality of services reached a value of 84.12. Statistically, there was no difference between the quality of the outpatient, emergency and inpatient departments with p=0.4 (>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in patient expectations and perceptions of service quality delivered both with p=0.000 (<0.05). Conclusions: According to the perceptions of patients, quality of service at the Universitas Gadjah Mada Hospital is excellent. There was no difference between the quality of service in the outpatient, emergency and inpatient units. There were statistically significant differences between patient expectations and perceptions of service quality.
基于患者视角的Gadjah Mada大学附属学术医院期望与优质医疗服务评价
背景:医院提供的卫生服务可以作为改善服务形象的资本,与其他医院竞争,成为患者解决健康问题的首选。患者对所提供的医疗服务有不同的看法,这可以用来描述医院服务的质量。方法:本研究采用横断面设计的描述性分析研究,数据检索采用问卷调查,从有形、响应性、移情、可靠性和保证5个质量维度衡量患者对门诊、住院和急诊服务的期望和感知。研究人群为门诊、住院、急诊科就诊的患者,按Slovin公式计算,共5000个样本,随机抽取120个样本。使用独立样本t检验对数据进行分析,以确定患者在就诊时对所获得服务的期望和看法的差异。采用方差分析方法分析患者对门诊部、住院部和急诊室的期望和认知差异。对于描述性研究,通过寻找患者反应的平均值来分析数据。结果:患者对服务质量的期望是重要的质量维度,其平均值达到93.97。对服务质量的感知达到84.12。门急诊住院质量差异无统计学意义,p=0.4(>0.05)。患者对服务质量的期望和感知差异均有统计学意义,p=0.000(<0.05)。结论:根据患者的感知,Gadjah Mada大学医院的服务质量是优秀的。门诊、急诊和住院部的服务质量没有差异。患者对服务质量的期望和感知之间存在统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信