A Tool for Easing the Cognitive Analysis of Design Prototypes of Aircraft Cockpit Instruments: The Human Efficiency Evaluator

S. Feuerstack, A. Lüdtke, Jan-Patrick Osterloh
{"title":"A Tool for Easing the Cognitive Analysis of Design Prototypes of Aircraft Cockpit Instruments: The Human Efficiency Evaluator","authors":"S. Feuerstack, A. Lüdtke, Jan-Patrick Osterloh","doi":"10.1145/2788412.2788434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Development and evaluation of dynamic and complex systems require new techniques and tools to evaluate the risks of Human and Systems Error, especially for safety critical systems. Established techniques like the cognitive workload analysis that can be used to assess the individual perceived operator workload for sets of tasks these are not widely used in industrial development. That is, because cognitive analysis of dynamic systems depends on complex architectures and simulations to evaluate workload over time, and is still driven by proprietary notations for cognitive models that require in-depth cognitive modeling skills and is currently only accessible to experts. In this paper we present an extension to CogTool, the Human Efficiency Evaluator (HEE) to ease the analysis of the impact of new instruments and new display designs with respect to human operator workload and task execution times. The tool is designed to make these cognitive analysis techniques available to non-experts, such as system analysts and engineers. We explain the cognitive modeling and analysis process supported by the HEE referring to an aeronautics scenario presented earlier by Hutchins. The cognitive analysis compares the task performance and workload of three generations of cockpit instrument designs to support pilots' with the slats/flaps settings during an aircraft approach with the current support in modern aircrafts and was performed by using the HEE.","PeriodicalId":191085,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2015","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2015","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2788412.2788434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Development and evaluation of dynamic and complex systems require new techniques and tools to evaluate the risks of Human and Systems Error, especially for safety critical systems. Established techniques like the cognitive workload analysis that can be used to assess the individual perceived operator workload for sets of tasks these are not widely used in industrial development. That is, because cognitive analysis of dynamic systems depends on complex architectures and simulations to evaluate workload over time, and is still driven by proprietary notations for cognitive models that require in-depth cognitive modeling skills and is currently only accessible to experts. In this paper we present an extension to CogTool, the Human Efficiency Evaluator (HEE) to ease the analysis of the impact of new instruments and new display designs with respect to human operator workload and task execution times. The tool is designed to make these cognitive analysis techniques available to non-experts, such as system analysts and engineers. We explain the cognitive modeling and analysis process supported by the HEE referring to an aeronautics scenario presented earlier by Hutchins. The cognitive analysis compares the task performance and workload of three generations of cockpit instrument designs to support pilots' with the slats/flaps settings during an aircraft approach with the current support in modern aircrafts and was performed by using the HEE.
简化飞机座舱仪表设计原型认知分析的工具:人的效率评估器
动态和复杂系统的开发和评估需要新的技术和工具来评估人为和系统错误的风险,特别是对于安全关键系统。现有的技术,如认知工作量分析,可用于评估个体感知操作员的工作量,但在工业发展中并未广泛使用。也就是说,因为动态系统的认知分析依赖于复杂的架构和模拟来评估工作负载,并且仍然由认知模型的专有符号驱动,这些模型需要深入的认知建模技能,并且目前只有专家才能访问。在本文中,我们提出了CogTool的扩展,人力效率评估器(HEE),以简化新仪器和新显示设计对人力操作员工作量和任务执行时间的影响分析。该工具旨在使这些认知分析技术可供非专家使用,例如系统分析师和工程师。我们根据Hutchins先前提出的航空场景,解释由HEE支持的认知建模和分析过程。认知分析比较了三代驾驶舱仪表设计的任务性能和工作量,以支持飞行员在飞机进近过程中使用板条/襟翼设置,并使用HEE进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信