Institutional Academic Accreditation Journey and Challenges

Abdullah Alzahem
{"title":"Institutional Academic Accreditation Journey and Challenges","authors":"Abdullah Alzahem","doi":"10.37881/jmahs.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Institutional academic accreditation is essential for the universities and a pre-requisite for requesting program accreditation. Academic accreditation is a structured review process to ensure the availability of minimum quality and the ability for continuous quality improvement. The accreditation process helped educational institutes to determine the areas for improvement and priorities improvements. \nAim: Investigate the impact of the institutional academic accreditation process on continuous quality improvement and address the challenges of the accreditation journey.\nMethod: A cross-sectional survey was used to record the impact of accreditation by collecting data through focus group discussions with the standards committees’ members. The interview was carried out in a structured format following the self-evaluation scale format. Data collected were managed and analyzed descriptively. \nResults: The accreditation process impacted the quality of education positively. Different aspects of education including program specifications and reports, assessment, evaluation, academic counseling, and student support were improved significantly, and automation was introduced to foster quality. The major challenges during the accreditation journey were identifying unified governance to institutional resources, and community partnership.\nConclusion: Accreditation improved education quality in the university without commanding any major change in the curricula and fostered the university ranking.","PeriodicalId":428123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Health Studies","volume":"176 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Health Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37881/jmahs.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Institutional academic accreditation is essential for the universities and a pre-requisite for requesting program accreditation. Academic accreditation is a structured review process to ensure the availability of minimum quality and the ability for continuous quality improvement. The accreditation process helped educational institutes to determine the areas for improvement and priorities improvements. Aim: Investigate the impact of the institutional academic accreditation process on continuous quality improvement and address the challenges of the accreditation journey. Method: A cross-sectional survey was used to record the impact of accreditation by collecting data through focus group discussions with the standards committees’ members. The interview was carried out in a structured format following the self-evaluation scale format. Data collected were managed and analyzed descriptively. Results: The accreditation process impacted the quality of education positively. Different aspects of education including program specifications and reports, assessment, evaluation, academic counseling, and student support were improved significantly, and automation was introduced to foster quality. The major challenges during the accreditation journey were identifying unified governance to institutional resources, and community partnership. Conclusion: Accreditation improved education quality in the university without commanding any major change in the curricula and fostered the university ranking.
机构学术认证之旅和挑战
背景:机构学术认证对大学来说是必不可少的,也是申请项目认证的先决条件。学术认证是一个结构化的审查过程,以确保最低质量的可用性和持续质量改进的能力。认证过程有助于教育机构确定需要改进的领域和优先改进的地方。目的:调查机构学术认证过程对持续质量改进的影响,并解决认证过程中的挑战。方法:采用横断面调查,通过与标准委员会成员进行焦点小组讨论收集数据,记录认可的影响。访谈采用自评量表格式进行。收集的数据进行描述性管理和分析。结果:认证过程对教育质量产生了积极影响。教育的不同方面,包括课程规范和报告、评估、评估、学术咨询和学生支持都得到了显著改善,并引入了自动化来提高质量。认证过程中的主要挑战是确定对机构资源的统一治理和社区伙伴关系。结论:认证提高了大学的教育质量,而没有对课程做出任何重大改变,并促进了大学排名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信