Impact of Infection on Glycemic Control in ‎Diabetic Patients; a Hospital-based Cohort ‎Study in Pakistan

S. Sethi, I. Khanum, U. Javed, Sania Sabir
{"title":"Impact of Infection on Glycemic Control in ‎Diabetic Patients; a Hospital-based Cohort ‎Study in Pakistan","authors":"S. Sethi, I. Khanum, U. Javed, Sania Sabir","doi":"10.21608/aeji.2022.156178.1246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"had poor-control. The mean pre-infection HbA1c in good-control diabetic patients was 6.2% while in poor-control was 8.5% (p: 0.000). While the mean post-infection HbA1c in the good-control was 6.9% and in the poor-control was 8.3% (p: 0.010). The poor-control group had a higher infection-related death rate (62.5% vs. 37.5%, p: 0.72), and multiple sites of infection (65.2% vs. 34.8%, p: 0.47). In the poor-control group, there was a higher rate of re-infection (52.8 vs. 47.2%, p: 0.45), whereas the rate of septic shock was similar (50%, p: 0.42). Conclusion: Based on our study, we conclude that infection had variable effect on glycemic control . Moreover, diabetes per se had a major effect on infection risk, its severity, and mortality, regardless of glycemic control.","PeriodicalId":261891,"journal":{"name":"Afro-Egyptian Journal of Infectious and Endemic Diseases","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Afro-Egyptian Journal of Infectious and Endemic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aeji.2022.156178.1246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

had poor-control. The mean pre-infection HbA1c in good-control diabetic patients was 6.2% while in poor-control was 8.5% (p: 0.000). While the mean post-infection HbA1c in the good-control was 6.9% and in the poor-control was 8.3% (p: 0.010). The poor-control group had a higher infection-related death rate (62.5% vs. 37.5%, p: 0.72), and multiple sites of infection (65.2% vs. 34.8%, p: 0.47). In the poor-control group, there was a higher rate of re-infection (52.8 vs. 47.2%, p: 0.45), whereas the rate of septic shock was similar (50%, p: 0.42). Conclusion: Based on our study, we conclude that infection had variable effect on glycemic control . Moreover, diabetes per se had a major effect on infection risk, its severity, and mortality, regardless of glycemic control.
感染对糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响巴基斯坦一项基于医院的队列研究
控制不良。控制良好的糖尿病患者感染前平均HbA1c为6.2%,而控制不良的糖尿病患者感染前平均HbA1c为8.5% (p: 0.000)。良好对照组感染后平均HbA1c为6.9%,不良对照组感染后平均HbA1c为8.3% (p: 0.010)。对照组感染相关死亡率较高(62.5%比37.5%,p: 0.72),多部位感染发生率较高(65.2%比34.8%,p: 0.47)。在对照组中,再感染率较高(52.8 vs. 47.2%, p: 0.45),而感染性休克发生率相似(50%,p: 0.42)。结论:根据我们的研究,我们认为感染对血糖控制有不同的影响。此外,无论血糖控制如何,糖尿病本身对感染风险、严重程度和死亡率都有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信