{"title":"Impact of Infection on Glycemic Control in Diabetic Patients; a Hospital-based Cohort Study in Pakistan","authors":"S. Sethi, I. Khanum, U. Javed, Sania Sabir","doi":"10.21608/aeji.2022.156178.1246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"had poor-control. The mean pre-infection HbA1c in good-control diabetic patients was 6.2% while in poor-control was 8.5% (p: 0.000). While the mean post-infection HbA1c in the good-control was 6.9% and in the poor-control was 8.3% (p: 0.010). The poor-control group had a higher infection-related death rate (62.5% vs. 37.5%, p: 0.72), and multiple sites of infection (65.2% vs. 34.8%, p: 0.47). In the poor-control group, there was a higher rate of re-infection (52.8 vs. 47.2%, p: 0.45), whereas the rate of septic shock was similar (50%, p: 0.42). Conclusion: Based on our study, we conclude that infection had variable effect on glycemic control . Moreover, diabetes per se had a major effect on infection risk, its severity, and mortality, regardless of glycemic control.","PeriodicalId":261891,"journal":{"name":"Afro-Egyptian Journal of Infectious and Endemic Diseases","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Afro-Egyptian Journal of Infectious and Endemic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aeji.2022.156178.1246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
had poor-control. The mean pre-infection HbA1c in good-control diabetic patients was 6.2% while in poor-control was 8.5% (p: 0.000). While the mean post-infection HbA1c in the good-control was 6.9% and in the poor-control was 8.3% (p: 0.010). The poor-control group had a higher infection-related death rate (62.5% vs. 37.5%, p: 0.72), and multiple sites of infection (65.2% vs. 34.8%, p: 0.47). In the poor-control group, there was a higher rate of re-infection (52.8 vs. 47.2%, p: 0.45), whereas the rate of septic shock was similar (50%, p: 0.42). Conclusion: Based on our study, we conclude that infection had variable effect on glycemic control . Moreover, diabetes per se had a major effect on infection risk, its severity, and mortality, regardless of glycemic control.