The phenomenon of rejection of the rules of decency in modern foreign policy and diplomacy

V. Chumakov
{"title":"The phenomenon of rejection of the rules of decency in modern foreign policy and diplomacy","authors":"V. Chumakov","doi":"10.33920/vne-01-2304-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to the cases of non-traditional methods of diplomacy that have appeared in recent years, uncommon for previous periods of international relations, such as: declassifi cation of confi dential negotiations, publication of foreign policy correspondence, release of restricted information, violation of diplomatic protocol, impoliteness in personal talks between offi cials. The content of the Russian-American communication on issues of strategic stability, maintenance of peace and the indivisibility of security in Euro-Atlantics — which also became property of the global audience — has been studied in detail. This analysis reveals signifi cant diff erences in understanding of the principle of equal security for all: no clear answer has been yet received to the question of how the «collective West» assumes its obligation not to strengthen its own security at the expense of the security of others and how Western governments intend to implement it practically in modern conditions or they withdraw from it. It is impossible to ensure a balance of interests in the world without full clarity on this key issue concerning the relationship of rights and obligations approved at the highest level. The answer would help in better understanding the readiness of the US, NATO and EU to reach agreement as well as the possibility of joint progress towards reducing tension and strengthening security in the OSCE region. Instead, extremely aggressive expressions, rhetoric and actions are used against Russia which are undertaken primarily in the form of the so-called cancel culture, illegal restrictions and unprecedented sanctions. They show that the «golden billion» has decided for itself that an undeclared hybrid war is going on not for life, but for death. It is concluded that Russian diplomacy has seriously complicated its work by counteracting the frankly unfriendly course of suppressing any foreign policy dissent, which the West has accepted and is not going to stop.","PeriodicalId":339528,"journal":{"name":"Diplomaticheskaja sluzhba (Diplomatic Service)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diplomaticheskaja sluzhba (Diplomatic Service)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33920/vne-01-2304-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is devoted to the cases of non-traditional methods of diplomacy that have appeared in recent years, uncommon for previous periods of international relations, such as: declassifi cation of confi dential negotiations, publication of foreign policy correspondence, release of restricted information, violation of diplomatic protocol, impoliteness in personal talks between offi cials. The content of the Russian-American communication on issues of strategic stability, maintenance of peace and the indivisibility of security in Euro-Atlantics — which also became property of the global audience — has been studied in detail. This analysis reveals signifi cant diff erences in understanding of the principle of equal security for all: no clear answer has been yet received to the question of how the «collective West» assumes its obligation not to strengthen its own security at the expense of the security of others and how Western governments intend to implement it practically in modern conditions or they withdraw from it. It is impossible to ensure a balance of interests in the world without full clarity on this key issue concerning the relationship of rights and obligations approved at the highest level. The answer would help in better understanding the readiness of the US, NATO and EU to reach agreement as well as the possibility of joint progress towards reducing tension and strengthening security in the OSCE region. Instead, extremely aggressive expressions, rhetoric and actions are used against Russia which are undertaken primarily in the form of the so-called cancel culture, illegal restrictions and unprecedented sanctions. They show that the «golden billion» has decided for itself that an undeclared hybrid war is going on not for life, but for death. It is concluded that Russian diplomacy has seriously complicated its work by counteracting the frankly unfriendly course of suppressing any foreign policy dissent, which the West has accepted and is not going to stop.
现代外交政策和外交中对体面规则的排斥现象
本文主要介绍近年来出现的在以往国际关系中不常见的非传统外交手段,如:秘密谈判的解密、对外政策函电的公开、保密信息的泄露、违反外交礼仪、官员私下谈话中的不礼貌等。对俄美关于欧洲-大西洋地区战略稳定、维护和平和安全不可分割问题的交流内容进行了详细研究,这些内容也成为全球听众的财产。这一分析揭示了对所有人平等安全原则理解上的重大差异:对于“集体西方”如何承担不以牺牲他人安全为代价加强自身安全的义务,以及西方政府打算如何在现代条件下实际实施或退出这一原则,目前还没有明确的答案。如果不充分明确这一涉及经最高一级核准的权利和义务关系的关键问题,就不可能确保世界上的利益平衡。答案将有助于更好地理解美国、北约(NATO)和欧盟(EU)达成协议的意愿,以及在缓解欧安组织(OSCE)地区紧张局势和加强安全方面取得共同进展的可能性。相反,对俄罗斯采取了极端激进的言论、言论和行动,主要形式是所谓的取消文化、非法限制和前所未有的制裁。他们表明,“黄金十亿”已经自己决定,一场不宣而战的混合战争不是为了生命,而是为了死亡。结论是,俄罗斯的外交使其工作变得非常复杂,因为它在压制任何外交政策异议方面采取了明显不友好的做法,而西方已经接受了这种做法,而且不会停止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信