Quantum categories for quantum logic

В.Л. Васюков
{"title":"Quantum categories for quantum logic","authors":"В.Л. Васюков","doi":"10.21146/2074-1472-2019-25-1-70-87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper is the contribution to quantum toposophy focusing on the abstract orthomodular structures (following Dunn-Moss-Wang terminology). Early quantum toposophical approach to \"abstract quantum logic\" was proposed based on the topos of functors $\\mathsf{[E,Sets]}$ where $\\mathsf{E}$ is a so-called orthomodular preorder category – a modification of categorically rewritten orthomodular lattice (taking into account that like any lattice it will be a finite co-complete preorder category). In the paper another kind of categorical semantics of quantum logic is discussed which is based on the modification of the topos construction itself – so called $quantos$ – which would be evaluated as a non-classical modification of topos with some extra structure allowing to take into consideration the peculiarity of negation in orthomodular quantum logic. The algebra of subobjects of quantos is not the Heyting algebra but an orthomodular lattice. Quantoses might be apprehended as an abstract reflection of Landsman's proposal of \"Bohrification\", i.e., the mathematical interpretation of Bohr's classical concepts by commutative $C^*$-algebras, which in turn are studied in their quantum habitat of noncommutative $C^*$-algebras – more fundamental structures than commutative $C^*$-algebras. The Bohrification suggests that topos-theoretic approach also should be modified. Since topos by its nature is an intuitionistic construction then Bohrification in abstract case should be transformed in an application of categorical structure based on an orthomodular lattice which is more general construction than Heyting algebra – orthomodular lattices are non-distributive while Heyting algebras are distributive ones. Toposes thus should be studied in their quantum habitat of \"orthomodular\" categories i.e. of quntoses. Also an interpretation of some well-known systems of orthomodular quantum logic in quantos of functors $\\mathsf{[E,QSets]}$ is constructed where $\\mathsf{QSets}$ is a quantos (not a topos) of quantum sets. The completeness of those systems in respect to the semantics proposed is proved.","PeriodicalId":155189,"journal":{"name":"Logical Investigations","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logical Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-1472-2019-25-1-70-87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper is the contribution to quantum toposophy focusing on the abstract orthomodular structures (following Dunn-Moss-Wang terminology). Early quantum toposophical approach to "abstract quantum logic" was proposed based on the topos of functors $\mathsf{[E,Sets]}$ where $\mathsf{E}$ is a so-called orthomodular preorder category – a modification of categorically rewritten orthomodular lattice (taking into account that like any lattice it will be a finite co-complete preorder category). In the paper another kind of categorical semantics of quantum logic is discussed which is based on the modification of the topos construction itself – so called $quantos$ – which would be evaluated as a non-classical modification of topos with some extra structure allowing to take into consideration the peculiarity of negation in orthomodular quantum logic. The algebra of subobjects of quantos is not the Heyting algebra but an orthomodular lattice. Quantoses might be apprehended as an abstract reflection of Landsman's proposal of "Bohrification", i.e., the mathematical interpretation of Bohr's classical concepts by commutative $C^*$-algebras, which in turn are studied in their quantum habitat of noncommutative $C^*$-algebras – more fundamental structures than commutative $C^*$-algebras. The Bohrification suggests that topos-theoretic approach also should be modified. Since topos by its nature is an intuitionistic construction then Bohrification in abstract case should be transformed in an application of categorical structure based on an orthomodular lattice which is more general construction than Heyting algebra – orthomodular lattices are non-distributive while Heyting algebras are distributive ones. Toposes thus should be studied in their quantum habitat of "orthomodular" categories i.e. of quntoses. Also an interpretation of some well-known systems of orthomodular quantum logic in quantos of functors $\mathsf{[E,QSets]}$ is constructed where $\mathsf{QSets}$ is a quantos (not a topos) of quantum sets. The completeness of those systems in respect to the semantics proposed is proved.
量子逻辑的量子范畴
这篇论文是对量子拓扑的贡献,专注于抽象的正模结构(遵循Dunn-Moss-Wang术语)。早期“抽象量子逻辑”的量子拓扑方法是基于函子$\mathsf{[E,Sets]}$的拓扑提出的,其中$\mathsf{E}$是一个所谓的正模预序范畴——一个修正的范畴重写的正模格(考虑到像任何格一样,它将是一个有限协完全预序范畴)。本文讨论了量子逻辑的另一种范畴语义,它是基于拓扑结构本身的修正,即所谓的$quantos$,它可以被评价为具有一些额外结构的拓扑的非经典修正,从而考虑到正模量子逻辑中否定的特殊性。量子子对象的代数不是Heyting代数,而是一个正模格。量子可以理解为Landsman提出的“Bohrification”的抽象反映,即用可交换的C^*$-代数对玻尔经典概念的数学解释,而非可交换的C^*$-代数——比可交换的C^*$-代数更基本的结构——在它们的量子栖息地中进行研究。Bohrification表明拓扑理论方法也需要改进。由于拓扑本质上是一种直观的构造,因此抽象情况下的Bohrification应该转化为基于正模格的范畴结构的应用。正模格是一种比Heyting代数更一般的构造——正模格是非分配的,而Heyting代数是分配的。因此,拓扑应该在它们的“正模”范畴即量子的量子栖息地中进行研究。此外,本文还构造了一些著名的函子量子中的正模量子逻辑系统$\mathsf{[E,QSets]}$的解释,其中$\mathsf{QSets}$是量子集的量子(而不是拓扑)。证明了这些系统在语义上的完备性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信