HİZMET BASKIN MANTIK YAKLAŞIMININ TEMATİK GELİŞİM SÜREÇLERİ VE BİLİMSEL ÜRETİM DİNAMİKLERİ: 2004-2021 YILLARI ARASI YAYIMLANAN ARAŞTIRMALARIN BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZİ

Hazal Duman Alptekin, Semra Doğan
{"title":"HİZMET BASKIN MANTIK YAKLAŞIMININ TEMATİK GELİŞİM SÜREÇLERİ VE BİLİMSEL ÜRETİM DİNAMİKLERİ: 2004-2021 YILLARI ARASI YAYIMLANAN ARAŞTIRMALARIN BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZİ","authors":"Hazal Duman Alptekin, Semra Doğan","doi":"10.15659/ppad.15.3.1068856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine the service dominant logic research, which have 17 years of experience in the marketing literature, with a bibliometric perspective. Within the scope of this purpose, 912 studies published in the Web of Science database between 2004-2021 were analyzed by considering scientific production dynamics and thematic development processes. In the analysis process, VOSviewer software was used to determine the dynamics of scientific production such as journals and authors that are effective in the field. In the studies examined, SciMAT software was used to deal with how the themes were shaped in the historical process. In the analysis of scientific production dynamics, Vargo and Lusch continued to be the most influential writers in the field, while the Journal of Marketing was determined as the most influential journal on service-dominated logic in the field. In the analysis of scientific production dynamics, Vargo and Lusch continued to be the most influential writers in the field, while the Journal of Marketing was determined as the most influential journal on service-dominated logic in the field. The thematic development process of service-dominated logic studies was examined over three periods (2004-2009; 2010-2015; 2016-2021). It was observed that thematic diversity exhibited a continuous increase in all three periods examined and the themes brought together marketing and management studies, albeit with a decreasing effect. Another prominent finding in the study is that the motor themes that shaped the field in the examined periods did not exhibit sustainability. At this point, it was observed that the diversity of themes increased as we approached the present day, while the sustainability of the themes between the periods weakened. Actors, consumer participation, business models, network theory, dominant logics, and performance themes in the inverse relationship between the diversity of themes and sustainability that stand out within the scope of the research have come to the fore as topics that have a high potential to contribute to the field and need research. The thematic development under bibliometric analysis deals with the formation of research themes in the field, based on the keywords defined as fingerprints in a scientific field. From this point of view, the first sub-period, 2004-2009, has been positioned as the entry year of service-dominant logic studies. As a result of the thematic analysis carried out in the relevant period, it was determined that six main themes stood out with a focus on the number of citations. It is seen that the service-dominated logic studies carried out for consumption communities are the main theme that directs the field. In line with the analyzes, another main theme that stands out in the field is performance-oriented service-dominated logic studies.","PeriodicalId":137040,"journal":{"name":"Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15659/ppad.15.3.1068856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine the service dominant logic research, which have 17 years of experience in the marketing literature, with a bibliometric perspective. Within the scope of this purpose, 912 studies published in the Web of Science database between 2004-2021 were analyzed by considering scientific production dynamics and thematic development processes. In the analysis process, VOSviewer software was used to determine the dynamics of scientific production such as journals and authors that are effective in the field. In the studies examined, SciMAT software was used to deal with how the themes were shaped in the historical process. In the analysis of scientific production dynamics, Vargo and Lusch continued to be the most influential writers in the field, while the Journal of Marketing was determined as the most influential journal on service-dominated logic in the field. In the analysis of scientific production dynamics, Vargo and Lusch continued to be the most influential writers in the field, while the Journal of Marketing was determined as the most influential journal on service-dominated logic in the field. The thematic development process of service-dominated logic studies was examined over three periods (2004-2009; 2010-2015; 2016-2021). It was observed that thematic diversity exhibited a continuous increase in all three periods examined and the themes brought together marketing and management studies, albeit with a decreasing effect. Another prominent finding in the study is that the motor themes that shaped the field in the examined periods did not exhibit sustainability. At this point, it was observed that the diversity of themes increased as we approached the present day, while the sustainability of the themes between the periods weakened. Actors, consumer participation, business models, network theory, dominant logics, and performance themes in the inverse relationship between the diversity of themes and sustainability that stand out within the scope of the research have come to the fore as topics that have a high potential to contribute to the field and need research. The thematic development under bibliometric analysis deals with the formation of research themes in the field, based on the keywords defined as fingerprints in a scientific field. From this point of view, the first sub-period, 2004-2009, has been positioned as the entry year of service-dominant logic studies. As a result of the thematic analysis carried out in the relevant period, it was determined that six main themes stood out with a focus on the number of citations. It is seen that the service-dominated logic studies carried out for consumption communities are the main theme that directs the field. In line with the analyzes, another main theme that stands out in the field is performance-oriented service-dominated logic studies.
本研究旨在以文献计量学的视角,检视已有十七年行销文献经验的服务主导逻辑研究。在此目的范围内,通过考虑科学生产动态和专题发展过程,分析了2004-2021年间发表在Web of Science数据库中的912项研究。在分析过程中,使用VOSviewer软件来确定科学生产的动态,例如在该领域有效的期刊和作者。在审查的研究中,使用了SciMAT软件来处理在历史过程中如何形成主题。在科学生产动态分析中,Vargo和Lusch继续是该领域最具影响力的作者,而Journal of Marketing被确定为该领域在服务主导逻辑方面最具影响力的期刊。在科学生产动态分析中,Vargo和Lusch继续是该领域最具影响力的作者,而Journal of Marketing被确定为该领域在服务主导逻辑方面最具影响力的期刊。服务主导的逻辑研究的主题发展过程分为三个阶段(2004-2009;2010 - 2015;2016 - 2021)。有人指出,在审查的所有三个期间,专题多样性不断增加,这些专题汇集了销售和管理研究,尽管效果有所减弱。该研究的另一个重要发现是,在研究期间塑造该领域的运动主题没有表现出可持续性。在这一点上,人们注意到,随着我们接近今天,主题的多样性增加了,而不同时期之间主题的可持续性减弱了。参与者、消费者参与、商业模式、网络理论、主导逻辑和绩效主题在主题多样性与可持续性之间的反比关系中,在研究范围内脱颖而出,成为对该领域有很大贡献潜力和需要研究的主题。文献计量学分析下的专题发展是指在一个科学领域中,以被定义为指纹的关键词为基础,研究该领域研究主题的形成。从这个角度来看,第一个子阶段,2004-2009年,被定位为服务主导逻辑研究的入门年。在有关期间进行专题分析后,确定了六个突出的主题,重点是引用次数。可见,针对消费群体开展的以服务为主导的逻辑研究是指导该领域的主旋律。与分析一致,该领域中另一个突出的主题是面向性能的服务主导的逻辑研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信