{"title":"Wacław Jaruzelski — bohater czy zdrajca? Nieoczywista biografia wojskowego i polityka","authors":"","doi":"10.36693/202004p.824-848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wacław Jaruzelski — a hero or a traitor?\nAn unobvious biography of a military man and politician\nThe article is devoted to a rather forgotten figure of an ancestor of General Wojciech\nJaruzelski, Wacław (1658–1706). The military and political career of the latter unfolded\nduring the reign of John III Sobieski and the first decade of the reign of Augustus II. Born in\na family that belonged to petty nobility in the Drohiczyn region in Podlasie, he threw in his\nlot with a local magnate, Stefan Mikołaj Branicki, owner of vast estates around Tykocin and\nBiałystok. Jaruzelski owed the prominent position achieved in the army and among his fellow\nnoblemen to both his patron’s protection, and his own skills and accomplishments. Thanks to\nthem he was able to move from a purely titulary dignity of stolnik (pantler) of Novgorod to\nthe prestigious office of chorąży (standard-bearer) of the Bielsk region, which gave him fairly\nbroad prerogatives. His activity in the public sphere went beyond the local horizon; he often\nserved as expert parliamentarian and judge. An examination of Wacław Jaruzelski’s colourful\nbiography makes it possible to take a closer look at characteristic phenomena of his day. As\nwe accompany him in the successive stages of his career, we can observe the destructive\nimpact of factional divisions within one local assembly (the dispute between Stefan Mikołaj\nBranicki and Jan Gniński, Voivode of Bratslav) and then the entire country (the Sapieha\ncase). Jaruzelski’s dramatic protest against the election of Stanisław Leszczyński, imposed by\na foreign power, followed by the difficult decision to side with Augustus II, unpopular with\nhis subjects, encapsulate, as it were, the experiences of the Polish and Lithuanian nobility of\nthose turbulent times.","PeriodicalId":146426,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Historyczny","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Historyczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36693/202004p.824-848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Wacław Jaruzelski — a hero or a traitor?
An unobvious biography of a military man and politician
The article is devoted to a rather forgotten figure of an ancestor of General Wojciech
Jaruzelski, Wacław (1658–1706). The military and political career of the latter unfolded
during the reign of John III Sobieski and the first decade of the reign of Augustus II. Born in
a family that belonged to petty nobility in the Drohiczyn region in Podlasie, he threw in his
lot with a local magnate, Stefan Mikołaj Branicki, owner of vast estates around Tykocin and
Białystok. Jaruzelski owed the prominent position achieved in the army and among his fellow
noblemen to both his patron’s protection, and his own skills and accomplishments. Thanks to
them he was able to move from a purely titulary dignity of stolnik (pantler) of Novgorod to
the prestigious office of chorąży (standard-bearer) of the Bielsk region, which gave him fairly
broad prerogatives. His activity in the public sphere went beyond the local horizon; he often
served as expert parliamentarian and judge. An examination of Wacław Jaruzelski’s colourful
biography makes it possible to take a closer look at characteristic phenomena of his day. As
we accompany him in the successive stages of his career, we can observe the destructive
impact of factional divisions within one local assembly (the dispute between Stefan Mikołaj
Branicki and Jan Gniński, Voivode of Bratslav) and then the entire country (the Sapieha
case). Jaruzelski’s dramatic protest against the election of Stanisław Leszczyński, imposed by
a foreign power, followed by the difficult decision to side with Augustus II, unpopular with
his subjects, encapsulate, as it were, the experiences of the Polish and Lithuanian nobility of
those turbulent times.