Ratio of Dense to Buoyant LDL Subclass is Associated with LDL Density Phenotype (VLDL-5)

Haitham M Ahmed, M. Elshazly, S. Martin, M. Blaha, K. Kulkarni, S. Jones
{"title":"Ratio of Dense to Buoyant LDL Subclass is Associated with LDL Density Phenotype (VLDL-5)","authors":"Haitham M Ahmed, M. Elshazly, S. Martin, M. Blaha, K. Kulkarni, S. Jones","doi":"10.2174/1875038901306010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dense LDL phenotypes are associated with increased atherogenicity, and are commonly evaluated for the purposes of atherosclerosis research and cardiovascular risk discrimination. Objective: To examine the ability of LDL subclasses, expressed as a ratio of dense-to-buoyant subclass, to predict LDL density phenotype. Methods: LDL subclasses and density phenotypes were measured with vertical auto profile ultracentrifugation in 1,339,898 consecutive lipid profiles between 2009 and 2011 from a clinical sample of US adults. Logarithmic LDL density ratio (LLDR) was calculated as ratio of dense-to-buoyant LDL subclasses, ln((LDL3-C + LDL4-C) / (LDL1-C +LDL2-C)); normally distributed after log-transformation. LLDR was compared to density phenotype using ROC C- statistic with optimum sensitivity and specificity cutpoints determined. Results: There was a strong, highly significant, monotonic increase in LLDR across progressively higher density phenotypes (p 0.905, sensitivity 81%, specificity 86%. There was also a positive correlation between LLDR and LDL Max Time (R 2 =0.802). Conclusion: LLDR is a convenient, easily calculated, and continuous variable that is strongly associated with LDL density phenotype and LDL Max Time. Further research is needed to investigate the relationship between lipoprotein density and size, and whether LLDR provides more cardiovascular risk discrimination than LDL density phenotype.","PeriodicalId":302199,"journal":{"name":"The Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1875038901306010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: Dense LDL phenotypes are associated with increased atherogenicity, and are commonly evaluated for the purposes of atherosclerosis research and cardiovascular risk discrimination. Objective: To examine the ability of LDL subclasses, expressed as a ratio of dense-to-buoyant subclass, to predict LDL density phenotype. Methods: LDL subclasses and density phenotypes were measured with vertical auto profile ultracentrifugation in 1,339,898 consecutive lipid profiles between 2009 and 2011 from a clinical sample of US adults. Logarithmic LDL density ratio (LLDR) was calculated as ratio of dense-to-buoyant LDL subclasses, ln((LDL3-C + LDL4-C) / (LDL1-C +LDL2-C)); normally distributed after log-transformation. LLDR was compared to density phenotype using ROC C- statistic with optimum sensitivity and specificity cutpoints determined. Results: There was a strong, highly significant, monotonic increase in LLDR across progressively higher density phenotypes (p 0.905, sensitivity 81%, specificity 86%. There was also a positive correlation between LLDR and LDL Max Time (R 2 =0.802). Conclusion: LLDR is a convenient, easily calculated, and continuous variable that is strongly associated with LDL density phenotype and LDL Max Time. Further research is needed to investigate the relationship between lipoprotein density and size, and whether LLDR provides more cardiovascular risk discrimination than LDL density phenotype.
高密度与浮力LDL亚类之比与LDL密度表型(VLDL-5)相关
背景:高密度LDL表型与动脉粥样硬化性增加相关,通常用于动脉粥样硬化研究和心血管风险区分。目的:检验LDL亚类(以密度与浮力亚类的比值表示)预测LDL密度表型的能力。方法:在2009年至2011年期间,用垂直自动超离心法测量了1339898例美国成人临床样本的连续脂质谱,并测量了LDL亚类和密度表型。对数LDL密度比(LLDR)计算为密度与浮力LDL亚类之比ln((LDL3-C + LDL4-C) / (LDL1-C +LDL2-C));经对数变换后正态分布。用ROC C统计比较LLDR与密度表型,确定最佳灵敏度和特异性切点。结果:LLDR在逐渐增加的高密度表型中有强烈的、高度显著的、单调的增加(p 0.905,敏感性81%,特异性86%)。LLDR与LDL Max Time呈正相关(r2 =0.802)。结论:LLDR是一个方便、易于计算、连续的变量,与LDL密度表型和LDL Max Time密切相关。需要进一步研究脂蛋白密度和大小之间的关系,以及LLDR是否比LDL密度表型提供更多的心血管风险识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信