{"title":"Working toward a seamless supply chain: an exploratory analysis of the impact of supply chain on company performance","authors":"Carol J. Johnson, Lidiya Sokhnich, Charles Ng","doi":"10.22237/JOTM/1143849960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Supply chain management has become an important topic to both practitioners and researchers alike. Practitioner definitions of supply chain management are numerous and emphasize different aspects of firm relationships. For example, the definition may emphasize meeting the \"real needs of the end customer\" (Wisner, Leong and Tan, 2004) or it may emphasize logistics-type processes as suggested by the Supply Chain Council definition: Managing supply and demand, sourcing raw materials and parts, manufacturing and assembly, warehousing and inventory tracking, order entry and order management, distribution across all channels, and delivery to the customer (Wisner, Leong and Tan, 2004). Yet another definition (Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals, 2006) emphasizes the strategic nature of supply chain across firms but does not mention the end customer: Supply Chain Management is the systemic, strategic coordination of traditional business functions within a particular company and across businesses within the supply chain, for the purposes of improving the long-term performance of the individual companies and the supply chain as a whole. None of these definitions mentions firm performance yet supply chain management has firm performance as an implicit goal. In the academic Literature, supply chain management emphasizes both cost reduction and increased customer value (Brewer and Speh, 2000) leading to sustainable competitive advantage (Mentzer et al., 2001). More recently, a survey of supply chain professionals was undertaken in an attempt to better define supply chain management (Gibson, Mentzer, and Cook, 2005). Yet even this most recent work suggests that \"only time wiU teU if it [CSCMP definition] becomes the consensus definition of SCM.\" Perhaps because of lack of a consensus definition and a lack of consistent management understanding, there remains a question of the connection between a high-performing supply chain and individual company performance. The lack of adequate understanding is likely due to the multifaceted and complex nature of supply chain relationships and the lack of firm-spanning metrics with which to measure these relationships. Cooper, Lambert, and Pagh (1997) suggest a conceptual supply chain framework consisting of business processes, management components, and supply chain structure and further suggest how to operationalize the framework using case studies (Lambert, Cooper, and Pagh, 1998). While managing the supply chain from point of origin to point of consumption is indeed a difficult task, the introduction of technology that improves information flow may help with firm integration across the supply chain (Walton and Miller, 1995). Further, many executives believe that profitability could increase if key business processes are linked and managed across multiple companies (Lambert, Cooper, and Pagh, 1998). The present research explores the importance of business processes, including customer service, business process documentation and measurement and management components such as accurate information exchange to firm performance using data collected from an online survey of high-level supply chain managers. The remainder of this work is organized as follows. First, the supply chain literature is briefly reviewed before describing the methodology. Next, the results are presented followed by a discussion of the managerial implications and recommendations for future research. LITERATURE REVIEW Business process documentation and measurement is found to vary with the importance of the process to the focal companies (Lambert, Cooper, and Pagh, 1998). A process may be defined as \"a structured and measured set of activities designed to produce a specific output for a particular customer or market\" (Davenport, 1993). While not all supply chain processes can be managed and documented in their entirety, for the more important processes this documentation will certainly decrease transaction costs and add to firm profitability. …","PeriodicalId":242296,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transportation Management","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transportation Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22237/JOTM/1143849960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Supply chain management has become an important topic to both practitioners and researchers alike. Practitioner definitions of supply chain management are numerous and emphasize different aspects of firm relationships. For example, the definition may emphasize meeting the "real needs of the end customer" (Wisner, Leong and Tan, 2004) or it may emphasize logistics-type processes as suggested by the Supply Chain Council definition: Managing supply and demand, sourcing raw materials and parts, manufacturing and assembly, warehousing and inventory tracking, order entry and order management, distribution across all channels, and delivery to the customer (Wisner, Leong and Tan, 2004). Yet another definition (Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals, 2006) emphasizes the strategic nature of supply chain across firms but does not mention the end customer: Supply Chain Management is the systemic, strategic coordination of traditional business functions within a particular company and across businesses within the supply chain, for the purposes of improving the long-term performance of the individual companies and the supply chain as a whole. None of these definitions mentions firm performance yet supply chain management has firm performance as an implicit goal. In the academic Literature, supply chain management emphasizes both cost reduction and increased customer value (Brewer and Speh, 2000) leading to sustainable competitive advantage (Mentzer et al., 2001). More recently, a survey of supply chain professionals was undertaken in an attempt to better define supply chain management (Gibson, Mentzer, and Cook, 2005). Yet even this most recent work suggests that "only time wiU teU if it [CSCMP definition] becomes the consensus definition of SCM." Perhaps because of lack of a consensus definition and a lack of consistent management understanding, there remains a question of the connection between a high-performing supply chain and individual company performance. The lack of adequate understanding is likely due to the multifaceted and complex nature of supply chain relationships and the lack of firm-spanning metrics with which to measure these relationships. Cooper, Lambert, and Pagh (1997) suggest a conceptual supply chain framework consisting of business processes, management components, and supply chain structure and further suggest how to operationalize the framework using case studies (Lambert, Cooper, and Pagh, 1998). While managing the supply chain from point of origin to point of consumption is indeed a difficult task, the introduction of technology that improves information flow may help with firm integration across the supply chain (Walton and Miller, 1995). Further, many executives believe that profitability could increase if key business processes are linked and managed across multiple companies (Lambert, Cooper, and Pagh, 1998). The present research explores the importance of business processes, including customer service, business process documentation and measurement and management components such as accurate information exchange to firm performance using data collected from an online survey of high-level supply chain managers. The remainder of this work is organized as follows. First, the supply chain literature is briefly reviewed before describing the methodology. Next, the results are presented followed by a discussion of the managerial implications and recommendations for future research. LITERATURE REVIEW Business process documentation and measurement is found to vary with the importance of the process to the focal companies (Lambert, Cooper, and Pagh, 1998). A process may be defined as "a structured and measured set of activities designed to produce a specific output for a particular customer or market" (Davenport, 1993). While not all supply chain processes can be managed and documented in their entirety, for the more important processes this documentation will certainly decrease transaction costs and add to firm profitability. …
供应链管理已经成为实践者和研究者的一个重要话题。从业者对供应链管理的定义很多,强调企业关系的不同方面。例如,该定义可以强调满足“最终客户的真正需求”(Wisner, Leong and Tan, 2004),也可以强调供应链委员会定义所建议的物流型流程:管理供需、采购原材料和零部件、制造和装配、仓储和库存跟踪、订单输入和订单管理、跨所有渠道的分销和交付给客户(Wisner, Leong and Tan, 2004)。然而,另一个定义(供应链管理专业人士委员会,2006)强调跨公司供应链的战略性质,但没有提到最终客户:供应链管理是一个特定公司内部和供应链内跨业务的传统业务功能的系统性战略协调,目的是提高单个公司和整个供应链的长期绩效。这些定义都没有提到企业绩效,但供应链管理将企业绩效作为一个隐含的目标。在学术文献中,供应链管理强调降低成本和增加客户价值(Brewer and Speh, 2000),从而获得可持续的竞争优势(Mentzer et al., 2001)。最近,为了更好地定义供应链管理,对供应链专业人员进行了一项调查(Gibson, Mentzer, and Cook, 2005)。然而,即使是最近的这项工作也表明,“只有当它[CSCMP定义]成为SCM的共识定义时,时间才会改变。”也许是因为缺乏共识的定义和缺乏一致的管理理解,高绩效供应链和单个公司绩效之间的联系仍然是一个问题。缺乏足够的理解可能是由于供应链关系的多面性和复杂性,以及缺乏衡量这些关系的公司跨越指标。Cooper, Lambert和Pagh(1997)提出了一个概念性的供应链框架,由业务流程、管理组件和供应链结构组成,并进一步提出了如何通过案例研究来实施该框架(Lambert, Cooper, and Pagh, 1998)。虽然管理从原产地到消费点的供应链确实是一项艰巨的任务,但引入改善信息流的技术可能有助于整个供应链的企业整合(Walton and Miller, 1995)。此外,许多高管认为,如果关键业务流程在多个公司之间进行链接和管理,盈利能力可能会增加(Lambert, Cooper, and Pagh, 1998)。目前的研究探讨了业务流程的重要性,包括客户服务、业务流程文档、测量和管理组件,如准确的信息交换对公司绩效的影响,使用的数据来自于对高级供应链经理的在线调查。本工作的其余部分组织如下。首先,在描述方法之前简要回顾了供应链文献。接下来,提出了结果,然后讨论了管理意义和对未来研究的建议。研究发现,业务流程文档和度量随着流程对重点公司的重要性而变化(Lambert, Cooper, and Pagh, 1998)。一个过程可以被定义为“一套结构化和可测量的活动,旨在为特定的客户或市场产生特定的输出”(Davenport, 1993)。虽然不是所有的供应链流程都可以被完整地管理和记录,但对于更重要的流程,这种记录肯定会降低交易成本并增加公司的盈利能力。…