YouTube Assessment as a Means of Documentary Research Students

Benjamín Maraza-Quispe, Luis Alfaro-Casas, O. Alejandro-Oviedo, N. Caytuiro-Silva, Crisia Vivanco Chavez, Walter Choquehuanca-Quispe, Yrma Esther Alay-Palomino, Kevin Quispe-Chambi
{"title":"YouTube Assessment as a Means of Documentary Research Students","authors":"Benjamín Maraza-Quispe, Luis Alfaro-Casas, O. Alejandro-Oviedo, N. Caytuiro-Silva, Crisia Vivanco Chavez, Walter Choquehuanca-Quispe, Yrma Esther Alay-Palomino, Kevin Quispe-Chambi","doi":"10.1145/3369255.3369299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research determines to what extent YouTube can be used as a research tool. To carry out the analysis, the design proposed by [1] in the \"Journal of Child Neurology\" was followed. The importance of this research lies in determining to what extent YouTube can be reliable to be used as a documentary research resource for students in the teaching-learning processes. To this end, thirty videos are selected on three different topics, which are analysed for their effectiveness in terms of technical concepts and for their reliability with respect to the information, they need; two videos, the highest and lowest score, are selected for an experimental group, comparing and contrasting results with a control group. The analysis shows that the videos with the highest scores obtained better grades. It can also be determined that YouTube can be used as a tool for documentary research, however, the correct search, selection and reliability practices are still the key to making the most of this platform. A rubric is also proposed to evaluate videos for using documentary research.","PeriodicalId":161426,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3369255.3369299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research determines to what extent YouTube can be used as a research tool. To carry out the analysis, the design proposed by [1] in the "Journal of Child Neurology" was followed. The importance of this research lies in determining to what extent YouTube can be reliable to be used as a documentary research resource for students in the teaching-learning processes. To this end, thirty videos are selected on three different topics, which are analysed for their effectiveness in terms of technical concepts and for their reliability with respect to the information, they need; two videos, the highest and lowest score, are selected for an experimental group, comparing and contrasting results with a control group. The analysis shows that the videos with the highest scores obtained better grades. It can also be determined that YouTube can be used as a tool for documentary research, however, the correct search, selection and reliability practices are still the key to making the most of this platform. A rubric is also proposed to evaluate videos for using documentary research.
YouTube评估作为纪录片研究学生的一种手段
这项研究决定了YouTube在多大程度上可以被用作研究工具。为了进行分析,参照《Journal of Child Neurology》[1]提出的设计。本研究的重要性在于确定YouTube在多大程度上可以可靠地作为学生在教学过程中的纪录片研究资源。为此目的,就三个不同的题目选择了三十部录象带,分析它们在技术概念方面的有效性和它们所需资料方面的可靠性;选取得分最高和最低的两个视频作为实验组,与对照组进行比较和对比。分析表明,得分最高的视频获得的成绩更好。这也可以确定YouTube可以作为纪录片研究的工具,但是,正确的搜索、选择和可靠性实践仍然是充分利用这个平台的关键。还提出了一个评价视频使用纪录片研究的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信