An Example of National Case Law on Moral Damages in the Field of Virtual Communities and Data Protection

S. Şchiopu
{"title":"An Example of National Case Law on Moral Damages in the Field of Virtual Communities and Data Protection","authors":"S. Şchiopu","doi":"10.51865/jetc.2022.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ease of communication thanks to services such as those offered by WhatsApp Messenger is not without correlative responsibilities, including in the field of personal data protection and the right to privacy. On a WhatsApp group, created for information to be sent from the Chairman of the Representative Council of Parents from Bucharest German Goethe College to parents and vice versa, the Chairman posted the document initiating a lawsuit filed by one of the parents against the Board as a result of the son's sanction consisting in a bad grade for behavior. Bucharest Tribunal held that the information provided by the college to the Chairman of the Representative Council of Parents by communicating the request for summons in its entirety exceeds the proportional and necessary character provided by Article 6 (1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Likewise, the Court held that the Chairman who disclosed the document had the opportunity to communicate only the information necessary to that community, not the personal data of the applicants. So the assertion that the defendant communicated the respective document only for information purposes cannot be retained, this exceeding the requirement of proportionality and the necessary character. The Tribunal found that, by committing the two illicit acts mentioned, the child's right to privacy was violated, as recognized by Article 8 ECHR and Article 71 of the Romanian Civil Code. Although a cassation appeal was filed, the outcome of this case came as no surprise, the appeal on a point of law being rejected.","PeriodicalId":226194,"journal":{"name":"JUS ET CIVITAS A Journal of Social and Legal Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JUS ET CIVITAS A Journal of Social and Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51865/jetc.2022.2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ease of communication thanks to services such as those offered by WhatsApp Messenger is not without correlative responsibilities, including in the field of personal data protection and the right to privacy. On a WhatsApp group, created for information to be sent from the Chairman of the Representative Council of Parents from Bucharest German Goethe College to parents and vice versa, the Chairman posted the document initiating a lawsuit filed by one of the parents against the Board as a result of the son's sanction consisting in a bad grade for behavior. Bucharest Tribunal held that the information provided by the college to the Chairman of the Representative Council of Parents by communicating the request for summons in its entirety exceeds the proportional and necessary character provided by Article 6 (1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Likewise, the Court held that the Chairman who disclosed the document had the opportunity to communicate only the information necessary to that community, not the personal data of the applicants. So the assertion that the defendant communicated the respective document only for information purposes cannot be retained, this exceeding the requirement of proportionality and the necessary character. The Tribunal found that, by committing the two illicit acts mentioned, the child's right to privacy was violated, as recognized by Article 8 ECHR and Article 71 of the Romanian Civil Code. Although a cassation appeal was filed, the outcome of this case came as no surprise, the appeal on a point of law being rejected.
虚拟社区与数据保护领域精神损害赔偿的国家判例法范例
WhatsApp Messenger等服务带来的沟通便利并非没有相关责任,包括在个人数据保护和隐私权领域。在一个为布加勒斯特德国歌德学院家长代表委员会主席向家长(反之亦然)发送信息而创建的WhatsApp群上,主席发布了一份文件,其中一名家长对董事会提起诉讼,原因是儿子因行为不良而受到处罚。布加勒斯特法庭认为,学院通过传达传唤请求向家长代表委员会主席提供的信息整体超过了法规(EU) 2016/679第6(1)条规定的比例和必要特征。同样,法院认为,披露该文件的主席有机会只向该群体传达必要的信息,而不是申请人的个人数据。因此,被告仅为提供信息而传达相关文件的主张不能被保留,这超出了相称性和必要性质的要求。法庭认为,如《欧洲人权公约》第8条和《罗马尼亚民法典》第71条所承认的那样,由于犯下上述两项非法行为,儿童的隐私权受到侵犯。尽管提出了撤销上诉,但此案的结果并不令人意外,对法律观点的上诉被驳回。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信