Maternity Legislation in Sri Lanka: Are Women Equal, Special or Different?

Sunethra M. E. Goonetilleke
{"title":"Maternity Legislation in Sri Lanka: Are Women Equal, Special or Different?","authors":"Sunethra M. E. Goonetilleke","doi":"10.4038/OUSLJ.V11I0.7343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pregnancy, childbirth and breast feeding are uniquely female experiences. While a woman’s role in reproduction fulfills the important social function of ensuring the continuity of the human race, it is also one which challenges her endeavour to enter the public sphere of paid employment. The creation and maintenance of a public and private divide and the setting of norms in the public sphere on the basis of male standards are barriers women have long fought to surmount. The aim of this paper is to study the laws governing maternity benefits in Sri Lanka, in order to uncover the foundations on which these laws are built. The study is normative in nature, focusing on applicable legislation in Sri Lanka. Therefore it discusses the provisions containing maternity benefits in the shop and Office Employees Act, the Maternity Benefits Ordinance and the provisions of the Establishment Codes relevant to state sector employees including university employees. The benefits studied are maternity leave, pay, nursing intervals, job security, health and safety of mother and child, paternity benefits and creche facilities. The paper then critically analyzes and compares the applicable laws. It concludes by highlighting the lack of uniformity among the legislation and investigating the likely rationales for this difference through a feminist lens focusing on the public-private divide, and the ‘equality’ and ‘different’ or ‘special’ approaches.","PeriodicalId":105560,"journal":{"name":"Ousl Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ousl Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/OUSLJ.V11I0.7343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Pregnancy, childbirth and breast feeding are uniquely female experiences. While a woman’s role in reproduction fulfills the important social function of ensuring the continuity of the human race, it is also one which challenges her endeavour to enter the public sphere of paid employment. The creation and maintenance of a public and private divide and the setting of norms in the public sphere on the basis of male standards are barriers women have long fought to surmount. The aim of this paper is to study the laws governing maternity benefits in Sri Lanka, in order to uncover the foundations on which these laws are built. The study is normative in nature, focusing on applicable legislation in Sri Lanka. Therefore it discusses the provisions containing maternity benefits in the shop and Office Employees Act, the Maternity Benefits Ordinance and the provisions of the Establishment Codes relevant to state sector employees including university employees. The benefits studied are maternity leave, pay, nursing intervals, job security, health and safety of mother and child, paternity benefits and creche facilities. The paper then critically analyzes and compares the applicable laws. It concludes by highlighting the lack of uniformity among the legislation and investigating the likely rationales for this difference through a feminist lens focusing on the public-private divide, and the ‘equality’ and ‘different’ or ‘special’ approaches.
斯里兰卡的生育立法:妇女是平等的、特殊的还是不同的?
怀孕、分娩和哺乳是女性独有的经历。虽然妇女在生育方面的作用履行了确保人类延续的重要社会职能,但这也是对妇女进入有报酬就业的公共领域的努力的挑战。公共和私人界限的创造和维持以及在公共领域以男性标准为基础的规范的制定是妇女长期以来努力克服的障碍。本文的目的是研究斯里兰卡管理产妇福利的法律,以揭示这些法律建立的基础。这项研究是规范性的,重点是斯里兰卡的适用立法。因此,本文讨论了《商店和办公室雇员法》、《产假福利条例》以及与国有部门雇员(包括大学雇员)相关的编制守则中包含产假福利的条款。所研究的福利包括产假、工资、护理间隔、工作保障、母婴健康和安全、陪产津贴和托儿所设施。然后对适用的法律进行了批判性的分析和比较。最后强调了立法之间缺乏一致性,并通过关注公私分歧的女权主义视角,以及“平等”和“不同”或“特殊”方法,调查了这种差异的可能原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信