Monitoring of glucose in people living with diabetes mellitus: A study comparing nano-based acetone/glucose breath analyzer, two commercial glucometers and laboratory-based glucose analysis

L. Tshotetsi, B. Mwakikunga, P. Rheeder
{"title":"Monitoring of glucose in people living with diabetes mellitus: A study comparing nano-based acetone/glucose breath analyzer, two commercial glucometers and laboratory-based glucose analysis","authors":"L. Tshotetsi, B. Mwakikunga, P. Rheeder","doi":"10.1109/NanofIM54124.2021.9737347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-invasive glucose testing is one of the novel methods for monitoring glucose in people living with diabetes mellitus. We researched how breathe acetone derived glucose levels compare to serum glucose and capillary glucose measure on two commercial glucose meters in diabetes mellitus patients at Steve Biko Academic Hospital. Breath acetone samples were collected in 127 patients from a diabetes clinic which was compared to lab analysed glucose and other 2 commercial glucose meters in a cross-sectional study. 69% $\\boldsymbol{(\\mathrm{n}=87)}$ of participants had type 1 diabetes. The majority of the diabetes patients were African 49 (58.34%). The mean acetone derived glucose level was $\\boldsymbol{9.3\\pm 4.3}$ mm whereas laboratory glucose mean was $\\boldsymbol{9.5\\pm 5.3}$ mmol/l, Accu-Chek meter mean was $\\boldsymbol{10\\pm 4.3}$ mmol/L and On Call Plus meter mean was $\\boldsymbol{9.8\\pm 5}$ mmol/L. After adjusting for body mass index, sex, race, age and other variables, there was no difference between breath acetone and laboratory glucose measurements (coefficient 0.20, confidence interval-0.41 to 0.81 and P-value 0.511). Our study reports that breath acetone glucose is comparable to laboratory glucose measurement and the 2 glucometers used for monitoring in diabetes mellitus. Therefore, the device could be of clinical importance in the monitoring of glucose in diabetics. Further exploration of its use on screening for elevated glucose or criticalcare is suggested.","PeriodicalId":130801,"journal":{"name":"2021 6th International Conference on Nanotechnology for Instrumentation and Measurement (NanofIM)","volume":"308 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 6th International Conference on Nanotechnology for Instrumentation and Measurement (NanofIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NanofIM54124.2021.9737347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-invasive glucose testing is one of the novel methods for monitoring glucose in people living with diabetes mellitus. We researched how breathe acetone derived glucose levels compare to serum glucose and capillary glucose measure on two commercial glucose meters in diabetes mellitus patients at Steve Biko Academic Hospital. Breath acetone samples were collected in 127 patients from a diabetes clinic which was compared to lab analysed glucose and other 2 commercial glucose meters in a cross-sectional study. 69% $\boldsymbol{(\mathrm{n}=87)}$ of participants had type 1 diabetes. The majority of the diabetes patients were African 49 (58.34%). The mean acetone derived glucose level was $\boldsymbol{9.3\pm 4.3}$ mm whereas laboratory glucose mean was $\boldsymbol{9.5\pm 5.3}$ mmol/l, Accu-Chek meter mean was $\boldsymbol{10\pm 4.3}$ mmol/L and On Call Plus meter mean was $\boldsymbol{9.8\pm 5}$ mmol/L. After adjusting for body mass index, sex, race, age and other variables, there was no difference between breath acetone and laboratory glucose measurements (coefficient 0.20, confidence interval-0.41 to 0.81 and P-value 0.511). Our study reports that breath acetone glucose is comparable to laboratory glucose measurement and the 2 glucometers used for monitoring in diabetes mellitus. Therefore, the device could be of clinical importance in the monitoring of glucose in diabetics. Further exploration of its use on screening for elevated glucose or criticalcare is suggested.
糖尿病患者血糖监测:纳米丙酮/葡萄糖呼吸分析仪、两种商用血糖仪和实验室血糖分析的比较研究
无创血糖检测是糖尿病患者血糖监测的新方法之一。我们研究了Steve Biko学术医院的糖尿病患者呼吸丙酮衍生葡萄糖水平与两种商用血糖仪测量的血清葡萄糖和毛细血管葡萄糖水平的比较。在一项横断面研究中,从一家糖尿病诊所收集了127名患者的呼气丙酮样本,并将其与实验室分析的葡萄糖和其他2种商用血糖仪进行了比较。69% $\boldsymbol{(\ mathm {n}=87)}$的参与者患有1型糖尿病。糖尿病患者以非洲裔居多(58.34%)。丙酮衍生葡萄糖水平平均值为$\boldsymbol{9.3\pm 4.3}$ mm,而实验室葡萄糖平均值为$\boldsymbol{9.5\pm 5.3}$ mmol/l, Accu-Chek仪表平均值为$\boldsymbol{10\pm 4.3}$ mmol/l, On Call Plus仪表平均值为$\boldsymbol{9.8\pm 5}$ mmol/l。在调整体重指数、性别、种族、年龄等变量后,呼吸丙酮和实验室葡萄糖测量值无差异(系数0.20,置信区间-0.41 ~ 0.81,p值0.511)。我们的研究报告呼气丙酮葡萄糖与实验室血糖测量和用于监测糖尿病的2个血糖仪相当。因此,该装置在糖尿病患者的血糖监测中具有重要的临床意义。建议进一步探索其在高血糖筛查或重症监护中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信