Monte Carlo (Tier 2) uncertainty analysis of Danish Greenhouse gas emission inventory

P. Fauser, P. Sørensen, Malene Nielsen, M. Winther, M. S. Plejdrup, L. Hoffmann, S. Gyldenkærne, M. H. Mikkelsen, R. Albrektsen, E. Lyck, M. Thomsen, Katja Hjelgaard, O. Nielsen
{"title":"Monte Carlo (Tier 2) uncertainty analysis of Danish Greenhouse gas emission inventory","authors":"P. Fauser, P. Sørensen, Malene Nielsen, M. Winther, M. S. Plejdrup, L. Hoffmann, S. Gyldenkærne, M. H. Mikkelsen, R. Albrektsen, E. Lyck, M. Thomsen, Katja Hjelgaard, O. Nielsen","doi":"10.1080/20430779.2011.621949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The methodology and results of Monte Carlo (Tier 2) uncertainty analysis of the Danish Greenhouse Gas (GHG) inventory for base year 1990 and most recent year 2008 are presented. The analysis covers 100% of the total net Danish GHG emissions and removals, excluding LULUCF. Methodological procedures such as random sampling of uncertain parameters and parameter correlation between years are explained. Uncertainties in activity data and emission factors are given for all sectors, Input data are assumed to have log-normal probability distributions, represented by median values and 95% confidence interval uncertainties. The total uncertainty levels for GHG emissions, expressed as 95% confidence intervals, are 4.1 and 5.3% for Tier 1 and Tier 2, respectively. Uncertainties in the trend are 2.4 and 6.9% for Tier 1 and Tier 2, respectively. The most influential sources from the Tier 2 analysis to the total uncertainty are CH4 from solid waste disposal on land (4.4%), N2O from leaching (3.0%), N2O from synthetic fertilizer (2.0%), and N2O and CH4 from manure management, each with 1.6%. Tier 1 and Tier 2 uncertainties in levels and trends are comparable to seven European countries that have performed a Tier 2 uncertainty analysis.","PeriodicalId":411329,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2011.621949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

The methodology and results of Monte Carlo (Tier 2) uncertainty analysis of the Danish Greenhouse Gas (GHG) inventory for base year 1990 and most recent year 2008 are presented. The analysis covers 100% of the total net Danish GHG emissions and removals, excluding LULUCF. Methodological procedures such as random sampling of uncertain parameters and parameter correlation between years are explained. Uncertainties in activity data and emission factors are given for all sectors, Input data are assumed to have log-normal probability distributions, represented by median values and 95% confidence interval uncertainties. The total uncertainty levels for GHG emissions, expressed as 95% confidence intervals, are 4.1 and 5.3% for Tier 1 and Tier 2, respectively. Uncertainties in the trend are 2.4 and 6.9% for Tier 1 and Tier 2, respectively. The most influential sources from the Tier 2 analysis to the total uncertainty are CH4 from solid waste disposal on land (4.4%), N2O from leaching (3.0%), N2O from synthetic fertilizer (2.0%), and N2O and CH4 from manure management, each with 1.6%. Tier 1 and Tier 2 uncertainties in levels and trends are comparable to seven European countries that have performed a Tier 2 uncertainty analysis.
丹麦温室气体排放清单的蒙特卡洛(二级)不确定性分析
本文介绍了1990年基准年和最近的2008年丹麦温室气体(GHG)清单的蒙特卡洛(第2层)不确定性分析的方法和结果。该分析涵盖了100%的丹麦温室气体净排放和清除总量,不包括LULUCF。说明了不确定参数的随机抽样和年份间参数相关性等方法步骤。给出了所有部门的活动数据和排放因子的不确定性,假设输入数据具有对数正态概率分布,由中位数和95%置信区间的不确定性表示。温室气体排放的总不确定性水平,用95%置信区间表示,一级和二级的不确定性水平分别为4.1和5.3%。一级和二级的趋势不确定性分别为2.4%和6.9%。二级分析对总不确定性影响最大的来源是陆地上固体废物处理产生的CH4(4.4%),浸出产生的N2O(3.0%),合成肥料产生的N2O(2.0%),以及粪便管理产生的N2O和CH4,各占1.6%。一级和二级不确定性的水平和趋势与七个进行了二级不确定性分析的欧洲国家相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信