{"title":"Continuous monitoring of curriculum via student communications components","authors":"D. Moore, D. Voltmer","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.897654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developing and maintaining a responsive curriculum along with an aim toward continuous improvement of both the student and the curriculum is a task that must be addressed not only by all engineering programs but by many other programs of study as well. The Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology has developed a process that helps provide the feedback necessary to address these curriculum issues; specifically in terms of written and oral communications, team functioning, and design methodology. The use of an electronic \"portfolio\" as the repository for student submissions is the starting point for the process. The procedure is designed to allow both a horizontal review (through a particular course) and a vertical review (Sophomore through Senior). The monitoring program focuses on the departmental design sequence involving a one quarter course in each of the Sophomore and Junior years, and a three quarter course in the Senior year. The student teams in each course submit material (in electronic format), material such as: meeting agendas and minutes, memos, interim reports, oral presentation slides (PowerPoint), and final reports. All the material is submitted as part of their regular course requirements. The submitted material is stored and organized to allow any component (team agendas for example) to be reviewed easily both horizontally and vertically using the rubric developed as part of the process. The system is designed to be used by internal or external reviewers. The paper gives a discussion of the process that was developed and the underlying rationalization. Specific examples are presented as well.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.897654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Developing and maintaining a responsive curriculum along with an aim toward continuous improvement of both the student and the curriculum is a task that must be addressed not only by all engineering programs but by many other programs of study as well. The Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology has developed a process that helps provide the feedback necessary to address these curriculum issues; specifically in terms of written and oral communications, team functioning, and design methodology. The use of an electronic "portfolio" as the repository for student submissions is the starting point for the process. The procedure is designed to allow both a horizontal review (through a particular course) and a vertical review (Sophomore through Senior). The monitoring program focuses on the departmental design sequence involving a one quarter course in each of the Sophomore and Junior years, and a three quarter course in the Senior year. The student teams in each course submit material (in electronic format), material such as: meeting agendas and minutes, memos, interim reports, oral presentation slides (PowerPoint), and final reports. All the material is submitted as part of their regular course requirements. The submitted material is stored and organized to allow any component (team agendas for example) to be reviewed easily both horizontally and vertically using the rubric developed as part of the process. The system is designed to be used by internal or external reviewers. The paper gives a discussion of the process that was developed and the underlying rationalization. Specific examples are presented as well.
开发和维护一个反应灵敏的课程,并以学生和课程的持续改进为目标,这不仅是所有工程专业必须解决的任务,也是许多其他学习项目必须解决的任务。罗斯-霍尔曼理工学院(Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology)的电气与计算机工程系开发了一个流程,帮助提供必要的反馈,以解决这些课程问题;特别是在书面和口头沟通,团队运作和设计方法方面。使用电子“作品集”作为学生提交的存储库是这个过程的起点。该程序的设计既允许横向复习(通过一门特定课程),也允许纵向复习(从大二到大四)。监控项目侧重于部门设计顺序,包括大二和大三各上四分之一的课程,大四上三分之一的课程。每门课程的学生小组提交材料(以电子格式),如:会议议程和会议纪要、备忘录、中期报告、口头演示幻灯片(PowerPoint)和期末报告。所有材料都是作为常规课程要求的一部分提交的。提交的材料被存储和组织,以允许任何组件(例如团队议程)使用作为流程一部分开发的标题轻松地横向和纵向审查。该系统被设计为供内部或外部审稿人使用。本文给出了开发过程的讨论和潜在的合理化。并给出了具体的例子。