Temporality in Great Expectations and Mrs. Dalloway: A Comparative Study

Ashraf Abu-Fares
{"title":"Temporality in Great Expectations and Mrs. Dalloway: A Comparative Study","authors":"Ashraf Abu-Fares","doi":"10.32996/ijahs.2021.1.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to discuss temporality in Charles Dickens’s novel Great Expectations and Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway. Temporality is an integral element in a literary text that greatly reflects the style an author adopts to represent the narrative framework and thematic concerns. However, there is a distinction in how traditional novelists and modern novelists deal with temporality. The events in Great Expectations are presented in a chronological order built on cause and effect. On the other hand, the narrative in Mrs. Dalloway is presented using the “stream of consciousness”; in the thoughts and feelings of the characters. Nonetheless, in Great Expectations, chronological order offers the plot unity and comprehension. It is also crucial in developing the theme of formation and development of the protagonist. In contrast, in Mrs. Dalloway, the experience of temporality is offered and shared by most characters. The reader is required to examine this experience to form a perception of the narrative structure and the themes of the novel. Therefore, this paper makes a comparative analysis between Great Expectations and Mrs. Dalloway to highlight the distinction between how traditional novels and modern novels deal with temporality to present the narrative and embody their authors’ concerns.","PeriodicalId":134830,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Arts and Humanities Studies","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Arts and Humanities Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/ijahs.2021.1.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss temporality in Charles Dickens’s novel Great Expectations and Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway. Temporality is an integral element in a literary text that greatly reflects the style an author adopts to represent the narrative framework and thematic concerns. However, there is a distinction in how traditional novelists and modern novelists deal with temporality. The events in Great Expectations are presented in a chronological order built on cause and effect. On the other hand, the narrative in Mrs. Dalloway is presented using the “stream of consciousness”; in the thoughts and feelings of the characters. Nonetheless, in Great Expectations, chronological order offers the plot unity and comprehension. It is also crucial in developing the theme of formation and development of the protagonist. In contrast, in Mrs. Dalloway, the experience of temporality is offered and shared by most characters. The reader is required to examine this experience to form a perception of the narrative structure and the themes of the novel. Therefore, this paper makes a comparative analysis between Great Expectations and Mrs. Dalloway to highlight the distinction between how traditional novels and modern novels deal with temporality to present the narrative and embody their authors’ concerns.
《远大前程》与《达洛维夫人》中的时间性比较研究
本文的目的是讨论查尔斯·狄更斯的小说《远大前程》和弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的《达洛维夫人》中的时间性。时间性是文学文本中不可缺少的元素,它在很大程度上反映了作者用来表达叙事框架和主题关注的风格。然而,传统小说家和现代小说家处理时间性的方式是不同的。《远大前程》中的事件是根据因果关系按时间顺序排列的。另一方面,《达洛维夫人》的叙事是用“意识流”来呈现的;在人物的思想和感情中。然而,在《远大前程》中,时间顺序提供了情节的统一性和理解。它对主人公形成和发展的主题也起着至关重要的作用。相比之下,在《达洛维夫人》中,大多数角色都提供并分享了短暂的经历。读者需要考察这种经历,以形成对小说叙事结构和主题的感知。因此,本文将《远大前程》与《达洛维夫人》进行对比分析,以突出传统小说与现代小说在处理时间性以呈现叙事和体现作者关注点方面的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信