A New Trend of Early Childhood Educational Research in the Early: A Study on Post-Qualitative Research

Youn-sun Lee
{"title":"A New Trend of Early Childhood Educational Research in the Early: A Study on Post-Qualitative Research","authors":"Youn-sun Lee","doi":"10.26834/ksycbc.2023.13.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to introduce philosophical foundation of post-qualitative research and its methodological theory by problematizing the epistimic prevalence and dominance of positivism in the field of qualtiative research of early childhood education. This study follows literature review which has been started from 2017 by collecting and synthetically analizing researcher’s continuous and deep reading and intra-active journals. The result can be categorized into three parts: first, the introduction of background of post-qualtitative research and post-philosophy, second, understanding post-qualtiative research: focused on St. Pierre, and third, post-qualtative research methdology as inquiry. The philosophical foundation of post-qualtative research is posthumanism, new-materialism, Barad’s agential realism and Deleuze’s thought. It overcomes the limits of methodological representationism and attempts to turn ontologically. Accordingly, perspective shift to relational ontology and resistance against interpretation during data analysis are important methodological issues. Post-qualitative research, as “thousand tiny methodologies”(Lather, 2013, p.635), goes beyond reflection and representation and is more likely to be diffractive, rhizomatic, experimentational and performative. I hope researchers would regard their own problems, thoughts, theories, concepts and intra-action with materisals valuable. Its own inquiry will be adventure and experimentation as long as it travels towards inquiry-driven way, not method-driven.","PeriodicalId":326278,"journal":{"name":"Korean Society for Critical Inquiry of Childhood Education","volume":"233 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Society for Critical Inquiry of Childhood Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26834/ksycbc.2023.13.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to introduce philosophical foundation of post-qualitative research and its methodological theory by problematizing the epistimic prevalence and dominance of positivism in the field of qualtiative research of early childhood education. This study follows literature review which has been started from 2017 by collecting and synthetically analizing researcher’s continuous and deep reading and intra-active journals. The result can be categorized into three parts: first, the introduction of background of post-qualtitative research and post-philosophy, second, understanding post-qualtiative research: focused on St. Pierre, and third, post-qualtative research methdology as inquiry. The philosophical foundation of post-qualtative research is posthumanism, new-materialism, Barad’s agential realism and Deleuze’s thought. It overcomes the limits of methodological representationism and attempts to turn ontologically. Accordingly, perspective shift to relational ontology and resistance against interpretation during data analysis are important methodological issues. Post-qualitative research, as “thousand tiny methodologies”(Lather, 2013, p.635), goes beyond reflection and representation and is more likely to be diffractive, rhizomatic, experimentational and performative. I hope researchers would regard their own problems, thoughts, theories, concepts and intra-action with materisals valuable. Its own inquiry will be adventure and experimentation as long as it travels towards inquiry-driven way, not method-driven.
早期幼儿教育研究的新趋势:后定性研究的研究
本研究旨在透过质疑实证主义在幼儿教育定性研究领域的认知盛行和主导地位,介绍后质化研究的哲学基础及其方法论理论。本研究从2017年开始进行文献综述,通过收集和综合分析研究者的持续深度阅读和内部活跃期刊。结果可以分为三个部分:第一,介绍后质研究和后哲学的背景,第二,了解后质研究:以圣皮埃尔为中心,第三,作为探究的后质研究方法。后定性研究的哲学基础是后人文主义、新唯物主义、巴拉德的代理实在论和德勒兹的思想。它克服了方法论表征主义的局限性,试图转向本体论。因此,在数据分析过程中,向关系本体论的视角转移和对解释的抵制是重要的方法论问题。后定性研究,作为“千种微小的方法”(泡沫,2013年,第635页),超越了反思和再现,更有可能是衍射,根茎,实验和表演。希望研究者用有价值的材料来看待自己的问题、思想、理论、观念和相互作用。它自己的探究将是冒险和实验,只要它走向探究驱动的方式,而不是方法驱动的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信