Management by objection? Public policies to protect choice in health plans.

L. Brown
{"title":"Management by objection? Public policies to protect choice in health plans.","authors":"L. Brown","doi":"10.1177/107755899773743927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consumer choice is a watchword of the market reforms now sweeping the U.S. health care system. Policy makers, however, must grapple with an important ambiguity; is the objective to expand choice or protect choosers, and what should be done if the two goals conflict? Concerns about health care market malfunctions trigger a politics of consumer protection that may emphasize regulatory standards over market flexibility. To complicate matters further, hopes that deluging consumers with information can ensure that choices are at once ample and prudent are likely to be disappointed.","PeriodicalId":169610,"journal":{"name":"Medical care research and review : MCRR","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical care research and review : MCRR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/107755899773743927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Consumer choice is a watchword of the market reforms now sweeping the U.S. health care system. Policy makers, however, must grapple with an important ambiguity; is the objective to expand choice or protect choosers, and what should be done if the two goals conflict? Concerns about health care market malfunctions trigger a politics of consumer protection that may emphasize regulatory standards over market flexibility. To complicate matters further, hopes that deluging consumers with information can ensure that choices are at once ample and prudent are likely to be disappointed.
反对管理?保护健康计划选择权的公共政策。
消费者的选择是目前席卷美国医疗保健系统的市场改革的口号。然而,政策制定者必须应对一个重要的模糊性;目标是扩大选择还是保护选择者?如果这两个目标发生冲突,应该怎么做?对医疗保健市场失灵的担忧引发了一场消费者保护政治,这种政治可能会强调监管标准而不是市场灵活性。让事情进一步复杂化的是,希望向消费者提供大量信息,以确保他们的选择既丰富又谨慎,这可能会让人失望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信