Assessments of final year diploma electrical engineering project 2

S. S. Rais, N. Enzai, S. Kar, Mohd Aziz Aris, Ermeey Abd Kadir, Rosheila Darus
{"title":"Assessments of final year diploma electrical engineering project 2","authors":"S. S. Rais, N. Enzai, S. Kar, Mohd Aziz Aris, Ermeey Abd Kadir, Rosheila Darus","doi":"10.1109/ICEED.2010.5940779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assessment of the Final Year Project 2 (FYP2) is very subjective if no proper guidelines are given especially if the marks are evaluated by more than a person. A fair assessment of FYP2 is therefore crucial to be considered and this paper presented a precise of assessments from supervisor and panel for implementation of a new code EEE368 for Diploma Electrical Engineering Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). The major shortcoming of the former code, KEU380 is that the marks for the final project or prototype were not fairly allocated. Only 10% is allocated for supervisor's evaluation and the students' efforts in accomplishing the final product were not measured. Even though the project is assigned in groups, teamwork was not assessed. Allocation of marks for EEE368 is based on the confidential syllabus from Faculty of Electrical Engineering (FKE) UiTM which are 40% from panel and 60% from supervisor. Hence, the FYP2 committees distributed the marks for a new syllabus as following criteria; for panel evaluations: Presentation Skills and Project Demonstration are 15% and 25% respectively, and for supervisor evaluations: 30% for Writing Skills and 10% for each criteria of Progress Work (Logbooks and meeting with supervisor), Teamwork and Project Demonstration. The benchmark for marks is categorized to poor, moderate, good and excellent and the details are discussed in this paper.","PeriodicalId":183006,"journal":{"name":"2010 2nd International Congress on Engineering Education","volume":"208 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 2nd International Congress on Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2010.5940779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The assessment of the Final Year Project 2 (FYP2) is very subjective if no proper guidelines are given especially if the marks are evaluated by more than a person. A fair assessment of FYP2 is therefore crucial to be considered and this paper presented a precise of assessments from supervisor and panel for implementation of a new code EEE368 for Diploma Electrical Engineering Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). The major shortcoming of the former code, KEU380 is that the marks for the final project or prototype were not fairly allocated. Only 10% is allocated for supervisor's evaluation and the students' efforts in accomplishing the final product were not measured. Even though the project is assigned in groups, teamwork was not assessed. Allocation of marks for EEE368 is based on the confidential syllabus from Faculty of Electrical Engineering (FKE) UiTM which are 40% from panel and 60% from supervisor. Hence, the FYP2 committees distributed the marks for a new syllabus as following criteria; for panel evaluations: Presentation Skills and Project Demonstration are 15% and 25% respectively, and for supervisor evaluations: 30% for Writing Skills and 10% for each criteria of Progress Work (Logbooks and meeting with supervisor), Teamwork and Project Demonstration. The benchmark for marks is categorized to poor, moderate, good and excellent and the details are discussed in this paper.
最后一年文凭电气工程项目评估
最后一年项目2 (FYP2)的评估是非常主观的,如果没有适当的指导方针,特别是如果分数是由一个以上的人评估。因此,对FYP2的公平评估是至关重要的,本文提出了来自主管和小组的精确评估,以实施文凭电气工程大学MARA (UiTM)的新代码EEE368。以前的代码KEU380的主要缺点是最终项目或原型的分数分配不公平。只有10%被分配给导师评估,学生在完成最终产品方面的努力没有被衡量。即使这个项目是分组进行的,团队合作也没有被评估。EEE368的分数分配基于UiTM电气工程学院(FKE)的保密教学大纲,其中40%来自小组,60%来自导师。因此,FYP2委员会按照以下标准分发新教学大纲的分数;小组评估:演讲技巧和项目演示分别占15%和25%,主管评估:写作技巧占30%,进度工作(日志和与主管的会议)、团队合作和项目演示各占10%。评分标准分为差、中、好、优四个等级,并对评分标准的具体内容进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信