Routine Colonoscopy after Diverticulitis Should not be Performed to Rule Out Colorectal Cancer

Dijkhorst Pj, Loffeld Rjlf
{"title":"Routine Colonoscopy after Diverticulitis Should not be Performed to Rule Out Colorectal Cancer","authors":"Dijkhorst Pj, Loffeld Rjlf","doi":"10.33805/2689-6737.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Diverticulitis is a clinical diagnosis generally confirmed by a radiological examination. Guidelines recommend routine screening for colorectal cancer after the acute phase.\nAim: Patients diagnosed with diverticulitis were studied in order to gain more information on presence of concomitant abnormalities. Material and methods: Inclusion criterion was the radiologic diagnosis of diverticulitis. All consecutive requests for ultrasound and/ or CT-scan of the abdomen in a three year period, with Diverticulitis mentioned in application were included. If diverticulitis was diagnosed, than this specific investigation was included in the present study. Hospital records were searched for the presence of endoscopic investigation. Results: In the three year period 1410 consecutive ultrasound investigation and/or CT-scans of the abdomen were performed. After exclusions 198 patients remained with the radiological confirmed diagnosis of diverticulitis. Of these patients 127 (64%) underwent an additional endoscopy. Seventy one patients (36%) did not undergo a colonoscopy. There was no difference in gender or in age between both groups. Colonoscopy showed additional abnormalities in 22 (17.3%) of the patients. These were hyperplastic polyp(s) in six, adenomatous polyp(s) in nine, polyps without histological confirmation in three and segmental colitis in three. Two male patients were diagnosed with sigmoid cancer. Both had non-subsiding diverticulitis with abscess formation at the location of the tumor. Conclusion: It is safe to omit colonoscopy after an episode of uncomplicated diverticulitis. Only in cases of complications or persistent complaints cancer should be part of the differential diagnosis and a subsequent colonoscopy should be performed.","PeriodicalId":316427,"journal":{"name":"Edelweiss: Cancer Open Access","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edelweiss: Cancer Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33805/2689-6737.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diverticulitis is a clinical diagnosis generally confirmed by a radiological examination. Guidelines recommend routine screening for colorectal cancer after the acute phase. Aim: Patients diagnosed with diverticulitis were studied in order to gain more information on presence of concomitant abnormalities. Material and methods: Inclusion criterion was the radiologic diagnosis of diverticulitis. All consecutive requests for ultrasound and/ or CT-scan of the abdomen in a three year period, with Diverticulitis mentioned in application were included. If diverticulitis was diagnosed, than this specific investigation was included in the present study. Hospital records were searched for the presence of endoscopic investigation. Results: In the three year period 1410 consecutive ultrasound investigation and/or CT-scans of the abdomen were performed. After exclusions 198 patients remained with the radiological confirmed diagnosis of diverticulitis. Of these patients 127 (64%) underwent an additional endoscopy. Seventy one patients (36%) did not undergo a colonoscopy. There was no difference in gender or in age between both groups. Colonoscopy showed additional abnormalities in 22 (17.3%) of the patients. These were hyperplastic polyp(s) in six, adenomatous polyp(s) in nine, polyps without histological confirmation in three and segmental colitis in three. Two male patients were diagnosed with sigmoid cancer. Both had non-subsiding diverticulitis with abscess formation at the location of the tumor. Conclusion: It is safe to omit colonoscopy after an episode of uncomplicated diverticulitis. Only in cases of complications or persistent complaints cancer should be part of the differential diagnosis and a subsequent colonoscopy should be performed.
憩室炎后不应进行常规结肠镜检查以排除结直肠癌
简介:憩室炎是一种临床诊断,通常由放射检查证实。指南建议在急性期后对结直肠癌进行常规筛查。目的:对诊断为憩室炎的患者进行研究,以获得更多有关伴随异常存在的信息。材料与方法:纳入标准为憩室炎的影像学诊断。所有在三年内连续要求进行腹部超声和/或ct扫描,并在申请中提到憩室炎的患者均被纳入。如果被诊断为憩室炎,那么本研究将纳入该特定调查。我们检索了医院记录以寻找内镜检查的存在。结果:在三年中,对腹部进行了1410次连续超声检查和/或ct扫描。排除后,198例患者放射学确诊为憩室炎。这些患者中有127例(64%)接受了额外的内窥镜检查。71例患者(36%)未接受结肠镜检查。两组在性别和年龄上没有差异。结肠镜检查显示22例(17.3%)患者有其他异常。其中增生性息肉6例,腺瘤性息肉9例,无组织学证实的息肉3例,节段性结肠炎3例。两名男性患者被诊断为乙状结肠癌。两例患者均为非消退性憩室炎,并在肿瘤部位形成脓肿。结论:无并发症的憩室炎发作后省略结肠镜检查是安全的。只有在并发症或持续抱怨的情况下,癌症才应作为鉴别诊断的一部分,并应进行结肠镜检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信