Advantages and challenges in using LCA-based environmental impact assessment for guiding design decisions

Nikhil Joshi, Stueti Gupta, Y. Jayawant, G. Mohapatra, S. Sahay
{"title":"Advantages and challenges in using LCA-based environmental impact assessment for guiding design decisions","authors":"Nikhil Joshi, Stueti Gupta, Y. Jayawant, G. Mohapatra, S. Sahay","doi":"10.1504/IJSDES.2013.057142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Owing to the increased awareness of environmental issues along with tighter regulatory norms, there is greater emphasis among manufacturers to lower the environmental impacts of their products and solutions. Many organisations are seeking to adapt the life cycle assessment (LCA) method to estimate impact during the design stage and guide the development of sustainable products. In this research, four case studies, involving different types of design scenarios and choices typically faced by designers, were used to study the application of such an approach. The case studies include choice of alternate materials, manufacturing process, design configurations and joining methods. The analysis of these case studies indicated that such an approach can provide valuable insights to designers. However, considerable experience and expertise is required to understand the inaccuracies and limitations introduced by assumptions inherent in the inventory databases as well as by the selected scope of analysis. This paper details the advantages and challenges that designers may encounter in this approach, and suggests directions for further research to enable seamless and effective integration of LCA-based methods in the conventional design process.","PeriodicalId":306645,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Design","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSDES.2013.057142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Owing to the increased awareness of environmental issues along with tighter regulatory norms, there is greater emphasis among manufacturers to lower the environmental impacts of their products and solutions. Many organisations are seeking to adapt the life cycle assessment (LCA) method to estimate impact during the design stage and guide the development of sustainable products. In this research, four case studies, involving different types of design scenarios and choices typically faced by designers, were used to study the application of such an approach. The case studies include choice of alternate materials, manufacturing process, design configurations and joining methods. The analysis of these case studies indicated that such an approach can provide valuable insights to designers. However, considerable experience and expertise is required to understand the inaccuracies and limitations introduced by assumptions inherent in the inventory databases as well as by the selected scope of analysis. This paper details the advantages and challenges that designers may encounter in this approach, and suggests directions for further research to enable seamless and effective integration of LCA-based methods in the conventional design process.
使用基于lca的环境影响评价指导设计决策的优势和挑战
由于对环境问题的认识日益提高以及更严格的管理规范,制造商更加强调降低其产品和解决方案对环境的影响。许多组织正在寻求采用生命周期评估(LCA)方法来评估设计阶段的影响,并指导可持续产品的开发。在本研究中,通过四个案例研究,涉及不同类型的设计场景和设计师通常面临的选择,来研究这种方法的应用。案例研究包括替代材料的选择、制造工艺、设计配置和连接方法。这些案例研究的分析表明,这种方法可以为设计师提供有价值的见解。但是,要了解盘存数据基固有的假设以及选定的分析范围所造成的不准确和限制,需要有相当多的经验和专门知识。本文详细介绍了设计人员在这种方法中可能遇到的优势和挑战,并提出了进一步研究的方向,以便将基于lca的方法无缝有效地集成到传统的设计过程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信