Operative Facts

Alf Ross
{"title":"Operative Facts","authors":"Alf Ross","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198716105.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers operative facts, which are defined as the complex totality of all facts that can be of relevance to a decision according to scientifically valid law. Among the operative facts, we can distinguish between those which are of specific relevance and those which are merely of conditioning (modifying, excluding) relevance. The former are also called law-creating facts and they are defined as those facts that, as a rule, give reason the specific legal effects. Among these facts are human acts which again should be divided into factual acts and legal acts or dispositions. Both groups are dealt with here. The former group include the act that is contrary to duty (the unlawful act), which is analysed independently. Acts in the latter group are always the effect of a competence. A distinction between public legal acts and private transactions is introduced but the account given is restricted only to private transactions.","PeriodicalId":162296,"journal":{"name":"On Law and Justice","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"On Law and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198716105.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter considers operative facts, which are defined as the complex totality of all facts that can be of relevance to a decision according to scientifically valid law. Among the operative facts, we can distinguish between those which are of specific relevance and those which are merely of conditioning (modifying, excluding) relevance. The former are also called law-creating facts and they are defined as those facts that, as a rule, give reason the specific legal effects. Among these facts are human acts which again should be divided into factual acts and legal acts or dispositions. Both groups are dealt with here. The former group include the act that is contrary to duty (the unlawful act), which is analysed independently. Acts in the latter group are always the effect of a competence. A distinction between public legal acts and private transactions is introduced but the account given is restricted only to private transactions.
的事实
本章考虑了可操作的事实,它被定义为根据科学有效的法律可以与决策相关的所有事实的复杂总和。在起作用的事实中,我们可以区分那些具有特定相关性的事实和那些仅仅具有条件作用(修改、排除)相关性的事实。前者也被称为造法事实,它们被定义为通常赋予特定法律效果的理由的事实。在这些事实中,人的行为又应分为事实行为和法律行为或处置。这两类人在这里都有涉及。前一类包括违反义务的行为(违法行为),并对其进行独立分析。后一类人的行为总是一种能力的结果。对公共法律行为和私人交易进行了区分,但给出的解释仅限于私人交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信