Leveraging Conceptual Models of Trust in Automated Systems to Promote `Appropriate Trust' in Autonomic Systems

Qin Zhu, D. Dawson, P. Agrawal, H. A. Muller
{"title":"Leveraging Conceptual Models of Trust in Automated Systems to Promote `Appropriate Trust' in Autonomic Systems","authors":"Qin Zhu, D. Dawson, P. Agrawal, H. A. Muller","doi":"10.1109/PACRIM.2007.4313276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are subtle differences between automated and autonomic software systems with respect to the observability of information that supports trust between the system and its operators (designers, administrators, and users). Applying conceptual models of trust developed for human relationships with automated systems directly to autonomic systems is simply inadequate. An autonomic system can, however, be modeled as a composition of sub-level automation systems. In this manner, designers can engender 'appropriate trust' in autonomic systems using conceptual models developed for automated systems, but must consider how administrators and users will observe information required for trust, specifically: purpose, process, and performance. It is possible to provide designers, administrators and users with information to engender trust by using an abstraction hierarchy modeling framework (for example: ecological interface design). In this paper, we propose the use of goal models during early requirements engineering to describe the purpose information of a system in an abstraction hierarchy.","PeriodicalId":395921,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACRIM.2007.4313276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

There are subtle differences between automated and autonomic software systems with respect to the observability of information that supports trust between the system and its operators (designers, administrators, and users). Applying conceptual models of trust developed for human relationships with automated systems directly to autonomic systems is simply inadequate. An autonomic system can, however, be modeled as a composition of sub-level automation systems. In this manner, designers can engender 'appropriate trust' in autonomic systems using conceptual models developed for automated systems, but must consider how administrators and users will observe information required for trust, specifically: purpose, process, and performance. It is possible to provide designers, administrators and users with information to engender trust by using an abstraction hierarchy modeling framework (for example: ecological interface design). In this paper, we propose the use of goal models during early requirements engineering to describe the purpose information of a system in an abstraction hierarchy.
利用自动化系统中的信任概念模型促进自主系统中的“适当信任”
在支持系统及其操作者(设计人员、管理员和用户)之间信任的信息的可观察性方面,自动化软件系统和自主软件系统之间存在微妙的差异。将为人类与自动化系统的关系而开发的信任概念模型直接应用于自主系统是完全不够的。然而,自治系统可以被建模为子级自动化系统的组合。通过这种方式,设计人员可以使用为自动化系统开发的概念模型在自治系统中产生“适当的信任”,但必须考虑管理员和用户将如何观察信任所需的信息,特别是:目的、过程和性能。通过使用抽象层次结构建模框架(例如:生态界面设计),可以为设计者、管理员和用户提供产生信任的信息。在本文中,我们建议在早期需求工程中使用目标模型来描述抽象层次结构中系统的目的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信