{"title":"Machines in the Hands of Capitalists: Power and Profit in Late Eighteenth-Century Cornish Copper Mines","authors":"Mary O’Sullivan","doi":"10.1093/pastj/gtac039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the inaugural issue of Past and Present, Eric Hobsbawm cautioned historians against the assumption that a capitalist economy has an inherent tendency to cost-saving and technological innovation, emphasizing that ‘It has a bias only towards profit’. Inspired by Hobsbawm, this article shows how a history of profit can elucidate the economic and social history of machines. Beginning with miners’ protests at the stoppage of Boulton & Watt steam engines in Cornish copper mines in the late 1780s, it shows that these engines’ implications for the people who invested in, and worked, the mines were conditioned by a complex relationship between profit and power: mechanical power, which was crucial to the mining of copper and the costs of its production; imperial power, given fluctuating demand for copper from different parts of the British empire; and market power, since control over price setting on the British copper market was crucial for Cornish mining profits. Understanding what determined mines’ profits helps to account for capitalists’ decisions to stop their engines as well as copper miners’ protests at their actions. More generally, it suggests the potential of studying the economic and social history of new machines through the lens of profit.","PeriodicalId":262011,"journal":{"name":"Past & Present","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Past & Present","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtac039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the inaugural issue of Past and Present, Eric Hobsbawm cautioned historians against the assumption that a capitalist economy has an inherent tendency to cost-saving and technological innovation, emphasizing that ‘It has a bias only towards profit’. Inspired by Hobsbawm, this article shows how a history of profit can elucidate the economic and social history of machines. Beginning with miners’ protests at the stoppage of Boulton & Watt steam engines in Cornish copper mines in the late 1780s, it shows that these engines’ implications for the people who invested in, and worked, the mines were conditioned by a complex relationship between profit and power: mechanical power, which was crucial to the mining of copper and the costs of its production; imperial power, given fluctuating demand for copper from different parts of the British empire; and market power, since control over price setting on the British copper market was crucial for Cornish mining profits. Understanding what determined mines’ profits helps to account for capitalists’ decisions to stop their engines as well as copper miners’ protests at their actions. More generally, it suggests the potential of studying the economic and social history of new machines through the lens of profit.
在《过去与现在》(Past and Present)的创刊号中,埃里克·霍布斯鲍姆(Eric Hobsbawm)告诫历史学家,不要认为资本主义经济具有节约成本和技术创新的内在倾向,他强调“资本主义经济只偏向于利润”。受霍布斯鲍姆的启发,这篇文章展示了利润的历史如何能够阐明机器的经济和社会历史。从18世纪80年代末矿工们对康沃尔铜矿博尔顿和瓦特蒸汽机停产的抗议开始,它表明,这些蒸汽机对投资和工作的人的影响受到利润和权力之间复杂关系的制约:机械动力,这对铜的开采及其生产成本至关重要;考虑到大英帝国不同地区对铜的需求波动,皇权;以及市场支配力,因为对英国铜市场定价的控制对康沃尔矿业的利润至关重要。理解是什么决定了矿山的利润,有助于解释资本家决定停止他们的发动机,以及铜矿工人对他们的行为的抗议。更一般地说,它表明了通过利润的视角来研究新机器的经济和社会历史的潜力。