Examining Motivation Factors on Bidding Decision in Crowdsourcing Platforms: Can Trust Mediates Motivation Factors on Bidding Decision in Crowdsourcing Malaysia: A Conceptual Study in Malaysia

{"title":"Examining Motivation Factors on Bidding Decision in Crowdsourcing Platforms: Can Trust Mediates Motivation Factors on Bidding Decision in Crowdsourcing Malaysia: A Conceptual Study in Malaysia","authors":"","doi":"10.55057/ijbtm.2023.5.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crowdsourcing in Malaysia has been recognised as an emerging industry that can be used as a platform to generate more income and offer businesses the chance to conduct their operations more innovatively. Crowdsourcing has become an efficient method for businesses to offer work opportunities to the general public so that they can apply their skills and earn more money. It is estimated that about 258,482 Malaysian digital talents that participate in crowdsourcing. The crowdsourcing system depends a lot on how many people use the platform. This is important for the success of the platform. However, the factors that motivate crowds to remain on the platform remain unclear, and there is very little literature on the subject. This paper is a conceptual paper that generates research propositions based on the comprehensive literature review and several theories regarding decision-making in crowdsourcing. Despite this, the paper is conceptual. Still, the claims made are based on theory, but they need to be tested in the proposed setting and context. In the future, researchers could add to the conceptual framework by validating the hypotheses more and adding mediators to the relationships that have been proposed. Other consequences and suggestions were also discussed.","PeriodicalId":253813,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Business and Technology Management","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Business and Technology Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55057/ijbtm.2023.5.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crowdsourcing in Malaysia has been recognised as an emerging industry that can be used as a platform to generate more income and offer businesses the chance to conduct their operations more innovatively. Crowdsourcing has become an efficient method for businesses to offer work opportunities to the general public so that they can apply their skills and earn more money. It is estimated that about 258,482 Malaysian digital talents that participate in crowdsourcing. The crowdsourcing system depends a lot on how many people use the platform. This is important for the success of the platform. However, the factors that motivate crowds to remain on the platform remain unclear, and there is very little literature on the subject. This paper is a conceptual paper that generates research propositions based on the comprehensive literature review and several theories regarding decision-making in crowdsourcing. Despite this, the paper is conceptual. Still, the claims made are based on theory, but they need to be tested in the proposed setting and context. In the future, researchers could add to the conceptual framework by validating the hypotheses more and adding mediators to the relationships that have been proposed. Other consequences and suggestions were also discussed.
众包平台投标决策的动机因素研究:信任是否在马来西亚众包平台投标决策的动机因素中起中介作用
在马来西亚,众包被认为是一个新兴产业,可以作为一个创造更多收入的平台,并为企业提供更具创新性的运营机会。众包已经成为企业向公众提供工作机会的一种有效方法,这样他们就可以运用自己的技能,赚更多的钱。据估计,约有258,482名马来西亚数字人才参与众包。众包系统在很大程度上取决于有多少人使用这个平台。这对平台的成功至关重要。然而,促使人群留在平台上的因素尚不清楚,关于这一主题的文献也很少。本文是一篇概念性的论文,在综合文献综述的基础上,结合众包决策的几种理论,提出了研究命题。尽管如此,这篇论文还是概念性的。尽管如此,这些说法是基于理论的,但它们需要在拟议的环境和背景下进行检验。在未来,研究人员可以通过更多地验证假设并为已提出的关系添加中介来增加概念框架。还讨论了其他后果和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信