{"title":"Agency Management in a Time of Crisis","authors":"Muiris MacCarthaigh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2018253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much of the analysis of agency proliferation has been framed in the context of the fragmentation of organizational structures brought about by New Public Management (NPM) and delegated forms of governance (Pollitt and Talbot 2004; Pollitt et al. 2004; Christensen and Laegreid 2007; Verhoest et al. 2010). Until recently, however, little attention has been devoted to the issues of agency termination and the process of ‘de-agencification’. These processes have emerged in importance as governments seek to achieve budgetary cutbacks through various austerity measures including the ‘rationalization’ of state structures. Following an examination of what is meant by an agency, the issue of agency termination is explored in this paper by unpacking the different forms through which agency terminations or ‘rationalizations’ are pursued. The paper then considers the issues arising from recent agency rationalizations, including the criteria proposed by governments and other organizations for retaining or terminating agencies, and the problems emerging in terms of agency management and control. In so doing, the paper also considers the hybrid forms of organization that emerge as a result of rationalization processes. The primary data will be provided by the Irish case and a time-series database of Irish state institutions between 1922 and 2011.","PeriodicalId":104767,"journal":{"name":"Strategy & Macroeconomic Policy eJournal","volume":"49 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategy & Macroeconomic Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2018253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Much of the analysis of agency proliferation has been framed in the context of the fragmentation of organizational structures brought about by New Public Management (NPM) and delegated forms of governance (Pollitt and Talbot 2004; Pollitt et al. 2004; Christensen and Laegreid 2007; Verhoest et al. 2010). Until recently, however, little attention has been devoted to the issues of agency termination and the process of ‘de-agencification’. These processes have emerged in importance as governments seek to achieve budgetary cutbacks through various austerity measures including the ‘rationalization’ of state structures. Following an examination of what is meant by an agency, the issue of agency termination is explored in this paper by unpacking the different forms through which agency terminations or ‘rationalizations’ are pursued. The paper then considers the issues arising from recent agency rationalizations, including the criteria proposed by governments and other organizations for retaining or terminating agencies, and the problems emerging in terms of agency management and control. In so doing, the paper also considers the hybrid forms of organization that emerge as a result of rationalization processes. The primary data will be provided by the Irish case and a time-series database of Irish state institutions between 1922 and 2011.
许多关于机构扩散的分析都是在新公共管理(NPM)和委托治理形式带来的组织结构碎片化的背景下进行的(Pollitt和Talbot 2004;Pollitt et al. 2004;Christensen and Laegreid 2007;Verhoest et al. 2010)。然而,直到最近,很少有人关注机构终止和“去机构化”过程的问题。随着政府通过各种紧缩措施,包括国家结构的“合理化”,寻求实现预算削减,这些过程变得越来越重要。在考察了代理的含义之后,本文通过揭示代理终止或“合理化”的不同形式来探讨代理终止的问题。然后,该文件审议了最近机构合理化所产生的问题,包括政府和其他组织提出的保留或终止机构的标准,以及在机构管理和控制方面出现的问题。在这样做的过程中,本文还考虑了作为合理化过程的结果而出现的混合形式的组织。主要数据将由爱尔兰案例和1922年至2011年间爱尔兰国家机构的时间序列数据库提供。