Risk and Trust in artificial intelligence technologies: A case study of Autonomous Vehicles

I. B. Ajenaghughrure, S. Sousa, D. Lamas
{"title":"Risk and Trust in artificial intelligence technologies: A case study of Autonomous Vehicles","authors":"I. B. Ajenaghughrure, S. Sousa, D. Lamas","doi":"10.1109/HSI49210.2020.9142686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates how risk influences users’ trust before and after interactions with technologies such as autonomous vehicles (AVs’). Also, the psychophysiological correlates of users’ trust from users” eletrodermal activity responses. Eighteen (18) carefully selected participants embark on a hypothetical trip playing an autonomous vehicle driving game. In order to stay safe, throughout the drive experience under four risk conditions (very high risk, high risk, low risk and no risk) that are based on automotive safety and integrity levels (ASIL D, C, B, A), participants exhibit either high or low trust by evaluating the AVs’ to be highly or less trustworthy and consequently relying on the Artificial intelligence or the joystick to control the vehicle. The result of the experiment shows that there is significant increase in users’ trust and user's delegation of controls to AVs’ as risk decreases and vice-versa. In addition, there was a significant difference between user's initial trust before and after interacting with AVs’ under varying risk conditions. Finally, there was a significant correlation in users’ psychophysiological responses (electrodermal activity) when exhibiting higher and lower trust levels towards AVs’. The implications of these results and future research opportunities are discussed.","PeriodicalId":371828,"journal":{"name":"2020 13th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI)","volume":"34 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 13th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI49210.2020.9142686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This study investigates how risk influences users’ trust before and after interactions with technologies such as autonomous vehicles (AVs’). Also, the psychophysiological correlates of users’ trust from users” eletrodermal activity responses. Eighteen (18) carefully selected participants embark on a hypothetical trip playing an autonomous vehicle driving game. In order to stay safe, throughout the drive experience under four risk conditions (very high risk, high risk, low risk and no risk) that are based on automotive safety and integrity levels (ASIL D, C, B, A), participants exhibit either high or low trust by evaluating the AVs’ to be highly or less trustworthy and consequently relying on the Artificial intelligence or the joystick to control the vehicle. The result of the experiment shows that there is significant increase in users’ trust and user's delegation of controls to AVs’ as risk decreases and vice-versa. In addition, there was a significant difference between user's initial trust before and after interacting with AVs’ under varying risk conditions. Finally, there was a significant correlation in users’ psychophysiological responses (electrodermal activity) when exhibiting higher and lower trust levels towards AVs’. The implications of these results and future research opportunities are discussed.
人工智能技术的风险与信任:以自动驾驶汽车为例
本研究探讨风险如何影响用户与自动驾驶汽车等技术互动前后的信任。此外,从用户的皮肤电活动反应中,可以看出用户信任的心理生理关系。18位经过精心挑选的参与者参加了一场假想的自动驾驶汽车旅行。为了保证安全,在基于汽车安全和完整性等级(ASIL D, C, B, A)的四种风险条件下(极高风险,高风险,低风险和无风险)的整个驾驶体验中,参与者通过评估自动驾驶汽车的高度或较低可信度来表现出高或低的信任,从而依赖人工智能或操纵杆来控制车辆。实验结果表明,随着风险的降低,用户的信任和用户对自动驾驶汽车的控制权委托显著增加,反之亦然。此外,在不同风险条件下,用户与自动驾驶汽车交互前后的初始信任存在显著差异。最后,当用户对自动驾驶汽车表现出更高和更低的信任水平时,他们的心理生理反应(皮电活动)存在显著的相关性。讨论了这些结果的意义和未来的研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信