Piping Vibration Mitigation Comparison Using Snubbers and Struts

K. L. Saunders, Michael Onorato
{"title":"Piping Vibration Mitigation Comparison Using Snubbers and Struts","authors":"K. L. Saunders, Michael Onorato","doi":"10.1115/pvp2022-85172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n One of the typical characteristics of high temperature piping systems is that they are more flexible. This is due primarily to expansion stress limits which cause the piping designer to add additional elbows and to minimize axial or lateral stops. The resulting higher flexibility and lower frequency piping system is vulnerable to vibration loading which may result in excessive displacements, and hence, excessive stresses. Two options for reducing vibration displacements are adding snubbers or adding struts to the piping system. Both snubbers and struts will act as rigid components when subjected to vibration loading. The snubber has the advantage over the strut of being able to displace in all directions when the piping system is heated, thus allowing the expansion stresses to be minimized. Also, snubbers that are better suited for mitigating operational vibrations also have the advantage of being effective in all three orthogonal directions. The strut has the advantage over the snubber in that the installation cost is less. Two identical piping systems were both experiencing high vibration loading requiring the addition of vibration mitigation supports. One piping system was remediated with snubbers, and the other was remediated with struts. The resulting cost differences and the vibration response of these two piping systems will be discussed. Additionally, the challenges of making these two approaches most effective will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":111167,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: Operations, Applications, and Components; Seismic Engineering; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis (NDPD) Division","volume":"17 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: Operations, Applications, and Components; Seismic Engineering; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis (NDPD) Division","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-85172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the typical characteristics of high temperature piping systems is that they are more flexible. This is due primarily to expansion stress limits which cause the piping designer to add additional elbows and to minimize axial or lateral stops. The resulting higher flexibility and lower frequency piping system is vulnerable to vibration loading which may result in excessive displacements, and hence, excessive stresses. Two options for reducing vibration displacements are adding snubbers or adding struts to the piping system. Both snubbers and struts will act as rigid components when subjected to vibration loading. The snubber has the advantage over the strut of being able to displace in all directions when the piping system is heated, thus allowing the expansion stresses to be minimized. Also, snubbers that are better suited for mitigating operational vibrations also have the advantage of being effective in all three orthogonal directions. The strut has the advantage over the snubber in that the installation cost is less. Two identical piping systems were both experiencing high vibration loading requiring the addition of vibration mitigation supports. One piping system was remediated with snubbers, and the other was remediated with struts. The resulting cost differences and the vibration response of these two piping systems will be discussed. Additionally, the challenges of making these two approaches most effective will be discussed.
减振器与支板对管道减振效果的比较
高温管道系统的典型特点之一是具有较强的灵活性。这主要是由于膨胀应力限制,导致管道设计人员增加额外的弯头,并尽量减少轴向或侧向停止。由此产生的更高的灵活性和更低频率的管道系统容易受到振动载荷的影响,这可能导致过大的位移,从而产生过大的应力。减少振动位移的两种选择是在管道系统中增加减震器或增加支柱。缓冲器和支柱在受到振动载荷时都是刚性部件。与支柱相比,缓冲器的优点是,当管道系统被加热时,缓冲器能够向各个方向位移,从而使膨胀应力最小化。此外,更适合于减轻操作振动的缓震器还具有在所有三个正交方向上都有效的优势。支杆比缓冲器的优点是安装成本更低。两个相同的管道系统都经历了高振动载荷,需要增加减振支撑。一个管道系统用缓冲器修复,另一个管道系统用支柱修复。由此产生的成本差异和这两种管道系统的振动响应将被讨论。此外,将讨论使这两种方法最有效的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信