Deduction of Interest and Other Borrowing Costs in Singapore: A Review of the Principles Set Out in Three Recent Court of Appeal Decisions

E. Poh
{"title":"Deduction of Interest and Other Borrowing Costs in Singapore: A Review of the Principles Set Out in Three Recent Court of Appeal Decisions","authors":"E. Poh","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2516256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decisions of the Singapore Court of Appeal in three recent cases have cleared up much of the uncertainty surrounding the interpretation of the law applicable to the income tax deduction of interest and other borrowing costs in Singapore. The purpose of this article is to review the principles underlying the deduction of such costs following from these cases and the issues previously in dispute that have since been resolved.","PeriodicalId":262460,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Public Tax Law - Non-U.S. (Topic)","volume":"47 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Public Tax Law - Non-U.S. (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2516256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decisions of the Singapore Court of Appeal in three recent cases have cleared up much of the uncertainty surrounding the interpretation of the law applicable to the income tax deduction of interest and other borrowing costs in Singapore. The purpose of this article is to review the principles underlying the deduction of such costs following from these cases and the issues previously in dispute that have since been resolved.
在新加坡扣除利息和其他借贷成本:对最近三个上诉法院判决中规定的原则的审查
新加坡上诉法院(Singapore Court of Appeal)在最近三起案件中的裁决,消除了围绕适用于新加坡所得税利息和其他借贷成本扣除的法律解释的许多不确定性。本文的目的是审查从这些案件中扣除这些费用的基本原则,以及以前有争议但后来得到解决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信