Introduction: entrepreneurial trends meet entrepreneurial education

D. Kariv, H. Matlay, A. Fayolle
{"title":"Introduction: entrepreneurial trends meet entrepreneurial education","authors":"D. Kariv, H. Matlay, A. Fayolle","doi":"10.4337/9781786438232.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Projections for coming entrepreneurial trends predict that artificial intelligence (AI) will be a thriving area for innovation; the evolution of the Internet of things will have more impact on the economy; the digital twin will take on vast importance, and Blockchain technology promises to change applications in government, healthcare, content distribution, and the supply chain (Cearley et al., 2017; Armstrong, 2018). These innovations, among other emerging entrepreneurial endeavors, will result in vast market disruption and innovation-driven growth; in Bower and Christensen’s (1995) terms, these trends encompass ‘disruptive innovation’. While the entrepreneurial landscape is fraught with constant bursts of innovation that reciprocally propel development of progressive modes of production, technology and business dynamics, entrepreneurship education (EE) does not reflect these innovations. The expectation is that EE will provide the relevant entrepreneurial-driven knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs), along with agile, creative mindsets and other psychological aspects (for example, self-effacement, motivation, intentions) to enable the implementation of such innovations into a viable, entrepreneurial business. However, research shows that EE for adult entrepreneurs still pursues conservative models, rather than forward-looking ones. This discrepancy between entrepreneurship and EE is echoed throughout the program types: the market is witnessing a gigantic outpouring of enabling systems (Matlay, 2006, 2008; Politis, 2005; Winkler et al., 2018), such as incubators, accelerators, academic programs for entrepreneurs, co-working spaces, corporate-based innovation centers, impact hubs, scaling accelerators, and digital accelerators, among others, but this substantial flux brings with it the question of relevant preparation for the entrepreneurial journey. The massively growing number of programs seems confusing to the learner-entrepreneurs, who need to determine which program will fit their needs as well as those of their stakeholders (Bischoff et al., 2018; Kariv et al., 2018; Steiner et al., 2018). Taken together, while entrepreneurship is characterized by vast","PeriodicalId":410120,"journal":{"name":"The Role and Impact of Entrepreneurship Education","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Role and Impact of Entrepreneurship Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786438232.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Projections for coming entrepreneurial trends predict that artificial intelligence (AI) will be a thriving area for innovation; the evolution of the Internet of things will have more impact on the economy; the digital twin will take on vast importance, and Blockchain technology promises to change applications in government, healthcare, content distribution, and the supply chain (Cearley et al., 2017; Armstrong, 2018). These innovations, among other emerging entrepreneurial endeavors, will result in vast market disruption and innovation-driven growth; in Bower and Christensen’s (1995) terms, these trends encompass ‘disruptive innovation’. While the entrepreneurial landscape is fraught with constant bursts of innovation that reciprocally propel development of progressive modes of production, technology and business dynamics, entrepreneurship education (EE) does not reflect these innovations. The expectation is that EE will provide the relevant entrepreneurial-driven knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs), along with agile, creative mindsets and other psychological aspects (for example, self-effacement, motivation, intentions) to enable the implementation of such innovations into a viable, entrepreneurial business. However, research shows that EE for adult entrepreneurs still pursues conservative models, rather than forward-looking ones. This discrepancy between entrepreneurship and EE is echoed throughout the program types: the market is witnessing a gigantic outpouring of enabling systems (Matlay, 2006, 2008; Politis, 2005; Winkler et al., 2018), such as incubators, accelerators, academic programs for entrepreneurs, co-working spaces, corporate-based innovation centers, impact hubs, scaling accelerators, and digital accelerators, among others, but this substantial flux brings with it the question of relevant preparation for the entrepreneurial journey. The massively growing number of programs seems confusing to the learner-entrepreneurs, who need to determine which program will fit their needs as well as those of their stakeholders (Bischoff et al., 2018; Kariv et al., 2018; Steiner et al., 2018). Taken together, while entrepreneurship is characterized by vast
创业趋势与创业教育相契合
对未来创业趋势的预测表明,人工智能(AI)将成为一个蓬勃发展的创新领域;物联网的演进将对经济产生更大的影响;数字孪生体将具有巨大的重要性,区块链技术有望改变政府、医疗保健、内容分发和供应链中的应用(ceearley等人,2017;阿姆斯特朗,2018)。这些创新,以及其他新兴的创业努力,将带来巨大的市场颠覆和创新驱动的增长;用鲍尔和克里斯滕森(1995)的话来说,这些趋势包含了“破坏性创新”。虽然创业领域充满了不断爆发的创新,这些创新相互推动了生产、技术和商业动态的进步模式的发展,但创业教育(EE)并没有反映这些创新。期望EE将提供相关的企业家驱动的知识,技能和能力(KSAs),以及敏捷,创造性思维和其他心理方面(例如,自我消除,动机,意图),以便将这些创新实施到可行的企业家业务中。然而,研究表明,成年企业家的情感表达仍然追求保守模式,而不是前瞻性模式。企业家精神和电子商务之间的这种差异在整个项目类型中得到了回应:市场正在见证一个巨大的支持系统的涌现(Matlay, 2006, 2008;politi, 2005;Winkler等人,2018),如孵化器、加速器、企业家学术项目、联合工作空间、基于企业的创新中心、影响中心、规模加速器和数字加速器等,但这种巨大的变化带来了为创业之旅做相关准备的问题。大量增长的项目似乎让学习者企业家感到困惑,他们需要确定哪些项目将满足他们以及利益相关者的需求(Bischoff等人,2018;Kariv et al., 2018;Steiner et al., 2018)。综上所述,而创业的特点是声势浩大
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信