Impact of Alleyway and In-row Planted Groundcovers in Midwestern Vineyard

B. Loseke, P. Read, S. Gamet
{"title":"Impact of Alleyway and In-row Planted Groundcovers in Midwestern Vineyard","authors":"B. Loseke, P. Read, S. Gamet","doi":"10.11648/J.AJAF.20210903.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many Midwestern vineyards a one meter weed-free strip is maintained directly beneath the vines to reduce vine-weed competition. Conventionally, this strip has been conserved with repeated applications of herbicide, mainly glyphosate. The necessity for this weed-free strip to reduce vine-weed competition has been well documented in more arid climates. However, in areas with higher soil fertility and adequate rainfall grapevines can become overly vigorous and competition with a groundcover (GC) has been shown to be a useful tool to alleviate excess growth. Moreover, stand establishment and early vine growth have not been well documented when planting GC immediately following the vine planting. The main objective of this project was to assess the severity of competition for water between ‘Edelweiss’ grapevines and neighboring permanent GC treatments. In year one (2014), the vineyard and GCs were established, where the GCs were planted immediately after the vines. Generally, GC treatments had lower Midday Leaf Water Potential (Ψmd) than the herbicide sprayed control, however, none of the treatments exhibited even slight water stress between 2015 and 2017. Vine-GC competition was most apparent in the three years of pruning weights, where the most native grass GC treatment had an average of 158% lower weights than the control. Results suggest that planting specific groundcovers in both the alleyways and in-row areas of the vineyard during the first year of establishment can be overly detrimental to vine growth and causes reduced yields but other groundcovers can be a useful alternative to chemical weed control.","PeriodicalId":310130,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJAF.20210903.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many Midwestern vineyards a one meter weed-free strip is maintained directly beneath the vines to reduce vine-weed competition. Conventionally, this strip has been conserved with repeated applications of herbicide, mainly glyphosate. The necessity for this weed-free strip to reduce vine-weed competition has been well documented in more arid climates. However, in areas with higher soil fertility and adequate rainfall grapevines can become overly vigorous and competition with a groundcover (GC) has been shown to be a useful tool to alleviate excess growth. Moreover, stand establishment and early vine growth have not been well documented when planting GC immediately following the vine planting. The main objective of this project was to assess the severity of competition for water between ‘Edelweiss’ grapevines and neighboring permanent GC treatments. In year one (2014), the vineyard and GCs were established, where the GCs were planted immediately after the vines. Generally, GC treatments had lower Midday Leaf Water Potential (Ψmd) than the herbicide sprayed control, however, none of the treatments exhibited even slight water stress between 2015 and 2017. Vine-GC competition was most apparent in the three years of pruning weights, where the most native grass GC treatment had an average of 158% lower weights than the control. Results suggest that planting specific groundcovers in both the alleyways and in-row areas of the vineyard during the first year of establishment can be overly detrimental to vine growth and causes reduced yields but other groundcovers can be a useful alternative to chemical weed control.
巷道和行栽地被对中西部葡萄园的影响
在美国中西部的许多葡萄园,葡萄藤正下方都有一条一米长的无杂草带,以减少葡萄藤杂草的竞争。传统上,这条带被反复使用除草剂,主要是草甘膦保护。在更干旱的气候条件下,这种无草带减少藤本杂草竞争的必要性已经得到了充分的证明。然而,在土壤肥力较高且降雨量充足的地区,葡萄藤可能变得过于旺盛,与地被植物(GC)竞争已被证明是缓解过度生长的有用工具。此外,在种植葡萄后立即种植GC时,林分建立和早期葡萄生长没有很好的记录。该项目的主要目的是评估“雪绒花”葡萄藤和邻近的永久GC处理之间对水的竞争程度。第一年(2014年),葡萄园和GCs建立,GCs在葡萄藤种植后立即种植。总体而言,GC处理的正午叶片水势(Ψmd)低于喷洒除草剂的对照,但在2015 - 2017年期间,所有处理都没有出现轻微的水分胁迫。葡萄-GC竞争在3年的修剪重量中最为明显,其中最原生草GC处理的平均重量比对照低158%。结果表明,在建立的第一年,在葡萄园的小巷和行区种植特定的地被植物可能对葡萄藤生长过度有害并导致产量下降,但其他地被植物可以作为化学杂草控制的有用替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信