Analysis of cesarean section causes using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System in selected hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences: a cross-sectional study
M. Akbarzadeh, Zohreh Rookesh, M. Zarshenas, N. Tayebi
{"title":"Analysis of cesarean section causes using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System in selected hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences: a cross-sectional study","authors":"M. Akbarzadeh, Zohreh Rookesh, M. Zarshenas, N. Tayebi","doi":"10.2174/1573404820666230427115622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nRobson’s Ten Group Classification System [RTGCS] is widely used to evaluate, monitor, and compare cesarean delivery [CD] rates within and between delivery service centers.\nThis study aimed to investigate the causes of CD in Shiraz teaching hospitals using RTGCS.\n\n\n\nA cross-sectional study on 1787 pregnant women who underwent CD in selected teaching hospitals in Shiraz, Iran, was selected via convenience sampling within 3 months. The\ndata collection tool was a demographic, midwifery, and fertility information questionnaire completed\nthrough interviews and medical records. Subjects’ classification was performed based on midwifery\nconcepts and parameters described in RTGCS. The Robson's 10-group classification is based on simple obstetrical parameters [parity, previous CS, gestational age, onset of labour, fetal presentation, and\nnumber of fetuses]. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and descriptive tests were used to describe the data.\n\n\n\nOf the 1787 subjects, 455 [25.5%] had planned CS and 1332 [74.5%] had emergency CS. The\nmost common causes of CD were previous CD [58.6%] and fetal distress [27.6%]. Overall, 823 [46.1%]\nhad fetal and placental causes, 1268 [71%] had uterine causes, and 78 [4.4%] had maternal causes\n\n\n\nThe biggest factors that played a role in the CD rate in the present study were termed\nmultipara women with a history of previous CD. The CD rate and the overall size of this group are\nstill increasing, and as a result, women with a history of a previous CD must be motivated more effectively to have a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery [VBAC]\n","PeriodicalId":371340,"journal":{"name":"Current Womens Health Reviews","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Womens Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404820666230427115622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Robson’s Ten Group Classification System [RTGCS] is widely used to evaluate, monitor, and compare cesarean delivery [CD] rates within and between delivery service centers.
This study aimed to investigate the causes of CD in Shiraz teaching hospitals using RTGCS.
A cross-sectional study on 1787 pregnant women who underwent CD in selected teaching hospitals in Shiraz, Iran, was selected via convenience sampling within 3 months. The
data collection tool was a demographic, midwifery, and fertility information questionnaire completed
through interviews and medical records. Subjects’ classification was performed based on midwifery
concepts and parameters described in RTGCS. The Robson's 10-group classification is based on simple obstetrical parameters [parity, previous CS, gestational age, onset of labour, fetal presentation, and
number of fetuses]. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and descriptive tests were used to describe the data.
Of the 1787 subjects, 455 [25.5%] had planned CS and 1332 [74.5%] had emergency CS. The
most common causes of CD were previous CD [58.6%] and fetal distress [27.6%]. Overall, 823 [46.1%]
had fetal and placental causes, 1268 [71%] had uterine causes, and 78 [4.4%] had maternal causes
The biggest factors that played a role in the CD rate in the present study were termed
multipara women with a history of previous CD. The CD rate and the overall size of this group are
still increasing, and as a result, women with a history of a previous CD must be motivated more effectively to have a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery [VBAC]