Written or video diary-which one to prefer in teacher education and why?

Liina Lepp, AnniKuusvek, Ä. Leijen, M. Pedaste, Annika Kaziu
{"title":"Written or video diary-which one to prefer in teacher education and why?","authors":"Liina Lepp, AnniKuusvek, Ä. Leijen, M. Pedaste, Annika Kaziu","doi":"10.1109/ICALT49669.2020.00090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to find out which advantages and disadvantages teacher students point out when using video diaries (compared to written diaries) during school practice and what are the similarities and differences of reflection levels between video and written diary posts. The dataset includes the results of written questionnaires from 24 teacher students and video and written diary posts by 18 of those students. Data was analyzed using inductive and deductive content analysis. The results of the study reveal that the advantages of video diary are the richness of emotions and authenticity, faster compilation, alternation to written work and opportunity to get used to watching and hearing oneself on video. The disadvantages pointed out were fear of the camera, issues with technology and digital competence, choice of location for video-recording, logic and thoughtfulness of the text and potential unwanted circulation of video material. Written practice diary posts contained fewer meaning units than video diary posts. In reflections of both formats, the descriptive level was most common.","PeriodicalId":153823,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT49669.2020.00090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of the study was to find out which advantages and disadvantages teacher students point out when using video diaries (compared to written diaries) during school practice and what are the similarities and differences of reflection levels between video and written diary posts. The dataset includes the results of written questionnaires from 24 teacher students and video and written diary posts by 18 of those students. Data was analyzed using inductive and deductive content analysis. The results of the study reveal that the advantages of video diary are the richness of emotions and authenticity, faster compilation, alternation to written work and opportunity to get used to watching and hearing oneself on video. The disadvantages pointed out were fear of the camera, issues with technology and digital competence, choice of location for video-recording, logic and thoughtfulness of the text and potential unwanted circulation of video material. Written practice diary posts contained fewer meaning units than video diary posts. In reflections of both formats, the descriptive level was most common.
书面或视频日记——在教师教育中你更喜欢哪一种?为什么?
本研究的目的是找出教师学生在学校实践中使用视频日记(与书面日记相比)时指出的优点和缺点,以及视频和书面日记在反思水平上的异同。该数据集包括24名教师学生的书面问卷调查结果,以及其中18名学生的视频和书面日记。数据分析采用归纳和演绎内容分析。研究结果表明,视频日记的优点是情感的丰富性和真实性,编写速度快,与书面工作的互换性,以及有机会习惯在视频中观看和听到自己。指出的缺点是害怕摄影机、技术和数字能力的问题、录像地点的选择、文本的逻辑性和深思熟虑性以及视频材料可能不必要的流通。书面练习日记比视频日记包含更少的意义单位。在这两种格式的反映中,描述性层次是最常见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信