A novel comparison of gauss-seidel and newton- raphson methods for load flow analysis

Sreemoyee Chatterjee, Suprovab Mandal
{"title":"A novel comparison of gauss-seidel and newton- raphson methods for load flow analysis","authors":"Sreemoyee Chatterjee, Suprovab Mandal","doi":"10.1109/ICPEDC.2017.8081050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All over the world, several methods of power flow analysis are used, namely Gauss-Seidel, Newton Raphson, Fast Decoupled Load Flow methods because power flow analysis is a critical factor for proper planning of power generating scheduling economically and calculation of power loss, bus voltage, angle. In this work, an operational comparison between Gauss-Seidel and Newton Raphson method is depicted using MATLAB simulation software for a 4-Bus system. By following the obtained values, it is prominent that Gauss Seidel follows the linear convergence whereas Newton Raphson exhibits the quadratic convergence. The selection of slack bus affects the Gauss-Seidel convergence adversely but for Newton-Raphson has minimal sensitivity towards this selection. While going through the simulation, it is lucid that Gauss-Seidel is comprehensible and reliable for small systems which are antithesis for Newton Raphson Method because repetitive computation of Jacobian makes it complicated.","PeriodicalId":145373,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Power and Embedded Drive Control (ICPEDC)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Power and Embedded Drive Control (ICPEDC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPEDC.2017.8081050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

All over the world, several methods of power flow analysis are used, namely Gauss-Seidel, Newton Raphson, Fast Decoupled Load Flow methods because power flow analysis is a critical factor for proper planning of power generating scheduling economically and calculation of power loss, bus voltage, angle. In this work, an operational comparison between Gauss-Seidel and Newton Raphson method is depicted using MATLAB simulation software for a 4-Bus system. By following the obtained values, it is prominent that Gauss Seidel follows the linear convergence whereas Newton Raphson exhibits the quadratic convergence. The selection of slack bus affects the Gauss-Seidel convergence adversely but for Newton-Raphson has minimal sensitivity towards this selection. While going through the simulation, it is lucid that Gauss-Seidel is comprehensible and reliable for small systems which are antithesis for Newton Raphson Method because repetitive computation of Jacobian makes it complicated.
潮流分析中高斯-赛德尔法与牛顿-拉弗森法的新颖比较
在世界范围内,潮流分析的几种方法被使用,即高斯-塞德尔法、牛顿-拉夫森法、快速解耦潮流法,因为潮流分析是经济合理地规划发电调度和计算功率损耗、总线电压、角度的关键因素。在这项工作中,利用MATLAB仿真软件对四总线系统进行了高斯-塞德尔和牛顿-拉夫森方法之间的操作比较。通过对所得值的跟踪,可以看出高斯·赛德尔遵循线性收敛,而牛顿·拉夫森则遵循二次收敛。松弛母线的选择对高斯-赛德尔收敛有不利的影响,但对于牛顿-拉夫森来说,对这种选择的敏感性很小。通过仿真可以清楚地看出,对于与Newton Raphson方法相对立的小系统,由于雅可比矩阵的重复计算使其变得复杂,Gauss-Seidel方法是可以理解和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信