Analogy and Association

Lin Dingyi
{"title":"Analogy and Association","authors":"Lin Dingyi","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-1467160492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analogy is not a method of logical reasoning but a method of conjecture. This is because the conclusion of logical reasoning in its true sense must be drawn inevitably from its premise through a certain logical process. But analogy does not have this characteristic. Therefore, in the sense of modern logic, analogy is generally not recognized as a logical method. It was in this sense that Einstein stressed that from experiential facts to theory there was no passage for logic. Of course, he could not deny the role played by analogy in scientific recognition; on the contrary, he attached great importance to this role. The problem is in the idea that analogy is not a \"passage for logic.\" As early as thirty years ago, the well-known contemporary American logician Tarski (Polish by origin) emphatically pointed out the difference between logic and empirico-scientific methods (analogy, induction, etc.) and at that time tended to doubt the possibility of the existence of any \"logic of empirical science,\" which is ...","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"155 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467160492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Analogy is not a method of logical reasoning but a method of conjecture. This is because the conclusion of logical reasoning in its true sense must be drawn inevitably from its premise through a certain logical process. But analogy does not have this characteristic. Therefore, in the sense of modern logic, analogy is generally not recognized as a logical method. It was in this sense that Einstein stressed that from experiential facts to theory there was no passage for logic. Of course, he could not deny the role played by analogy in scientific recognition; on the contrary, he attached great importance to this role. The problem is in the idea that analogy is not a "passage for logic." As early as thirty years ago, the well-known contemporary American logician Tarski (Polish by origin) emphatically pointed out the difference between logic and empirico-scientific methods (analogy, induction, etc.) and at that time tended to doubt the possibility of the existence of any "logic of empirical science," which is ...
类比与联想
类比不是一种逻辑推理的方法,而是一种猜想的方法。这是因为真正意义上的逻辑推理的结论,必然要经过一定的逻辑过程,从它的前提中得出。但是类比没有这个特点。因此,在现代逻辑意义上,类比一般不被认为是一种逻辑方法。正是在这个意义上,爱因斯坦强调,从经验事实到理论,没有逻辑的通道。当然,他不能否认类比在科学认识中所起的作用;相反,他非常重视这个角色。问题在于,类比并不是“逻辑的通道”。早在三十年前,著名的当代美国逻辑学家塔斯基(波兰裔)就着重指出了逻辑学与经验科学方法(类比、归纳法等)的区别,并在当时倾向于怀疑任何“经验科学逻辑”存在的可能性,即……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信