{"title":"Analogy and Association","authors":"Lin Dingyi","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-1467160492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analogy is not a method of logical reasoning but a method of conjecture. This is because the conclusion of logical reasoning in its true sense must be drawn inevitably from its premise through a certain logical process. But analogy does not have this characteristic. Therefore, in the sense of modern logic, analogy is generally not recognized as a logical method. It was in this sense that Einstein stressed that from experiential facts to theory there was no passage for logic. Of course, he could not deny the role played by analogy in scientific recognition; on the contrary, he attached great importance to this role. The problem is in the idea that analogy is not a \"passage for logic.\" As early as thirty years ago, the well-known contemporary American logician Tarski (Polish by origin) emphatically pointed out the difference between logic and empirico-scientific methods (analogy, induction, etc.) and at that time tended to doubt the possibility of the existence of any \"logic of empirical science,\" which is ...","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"155 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467160492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Analogy is not a method of logical reasoning but a method of conjecture. This is because the conclusion of logical reasoning in its true sense must be drawn inevitably from its premise through a certain logical process. But analogy does not have this characteristic. Therefore, in the sense of modern logic, analogy is generally not recognized as a logical method. It was in this sense that Einstein stressed that from experiential facts to theory there was no passage for logic. Of course, he could not deny the role played by analogy in scientific recognition; on the contrary, he attached great importance to this role. The problem is in the idea that analogy is not a "passage for logic." As early as thirty years ago, the well-known contemporary American logician Tarski (Polish by origin) emphatically pointed out the difference between logic and empirico-scientific methods (analogy, induction, etc.) and at that time tended to doubt the possibility of the existence of any "logic of empirical science," which is ...