CINEMA AS A CULTURAL INDUSTRY: MODERN MYTH-MAKING

Y. Liao
{"title":"CINEMA AS A CULTURAL INDUSTRY: MODERN MYTH-MAKING","authors":"Y. Liao","doi":"10.37313/2413-9645-2023-25-88-79-86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the possibilities of using cinema to create and disseminate myths (political, social, cultural). At the same time, the role of cinema as a cultural industry is noted, where the creation of screen reality acts as a special type of myth-making, which is evaluated not only in terms of economic effect, but, above all, as a mechanism for creating new original images of social and therapeutic value. A film work is considered as a sign ensemble, while it is determined that the level of saturation with signs and the choice of sign systems are subject to the author's intention, accordingly, the question naturally arises: what is the author's intention “subject to”. At the same time, mass cinema builds its influence in such a way that the addressee receives the maximum possible emotional impression with guaranteed pleasure. Therefore, it is “tuned” to the “general” public with the maximum average degree of perception, with the most famous iconic signs. The paper provides an analysis of the mythology of Soviet cinema, Hollywood myth-making. According to the author of the article, the creators of modern myths, without ignoring the terms and concepts of \"myth-making\" and \"mythologization\", operate with a new concept - \"mythotechnologies\", which, depending on the goals, differ for cinema in that in the process a \"new mythological image\" or an existing one will be used.","PeriodicalId":284515,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiya of the Samara Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social, Humanitarian, Medicobiological Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiya of the Samara Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social, Humanitarian, Medicobiological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37313/2413-9645-2023-25-88-79-86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the possibilities of using cinema to create and disseminate myths (political, social, cultural). At the same time, the role of cinema as a cultural industry is noted, where the creation of screen reality acts as a special type of myth-making, which is evaluated not only in terms of economic effect, but, above all, as a mechanism for creating new original images of social and therapeutic value. A film work is considered as a sign ensemble, while it is determined that the level of saturation with signs and the choice of sign systems are subject to the author's intention, accordingly, the question naturally arises: what is the author's intention “subject to”. At the same time, mass cinema builds its influence in such a way that the addressee receives the maximum possible emotional impression with guaranteed pleasure. Therefore, it is “tuned” to the “general” public with the maximum average degree of perception, with the most famous iconic signs. The paper provides an analysis of the mythology of Soviet cinema, Hollywood myth-making. According to the author of the article, the creators of modern myths, without ignoring the terms and concepts of "myth-making" and "mythologization", operate with a new concept - "mythotechnologies", which, depending on the goals, differ for cinema in that in the process a "new mythological image" or an existing one will be used.
作为文化产业的电影:现代神话制造
本文分析了利用电影创造和传播神话(政治、社会、文化)的可能性。与此同时,电影作为一种文化产业的作用被注意到,其中屏幕现实的创造作为一种特殊类型的神话制作,不仅在经济效果方面进行评估,而且最重要的是,作为一种创造具有社会和治疗价值的新原始图像的机制。电影作品被视为一个符号集合,而确定了符号的饱和程度和符号系统的选择取决于作者的意图,因此,问题自然产生了:作者的意图“受制于”是什么?与此同时,大众电影以这样一种方式建立其影响力,即收件人在保证愉悦的情况下获得最大可能的情感印象。因此,它被“调谐”到具有最大平均感知度的“一般”公众,具有最著名的标志性标志。本文分析了苏联电影的神话,好莱坞的神话制造。本文作者认为,现代神话的创造者并没有忽视“神话制造”和“神话化”这两个术语和概念,而是用一种新的概念——“神话技术”来操作,这对电影来说,根据目标的不同,在这个过程中会使用“新的神话形象”或现有的神话形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信